TVS Akula 310 vs UM Renegade Commando Classic

Compare Specifications of Akula 310 and Renegade Commando Classic

Selected Bikes

TVS Akula 310
TVS Akula 310

Brand:

Model:

UM Renegade Commando Classic
UM Renegade Commando Classic

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 310.00 cc 279.50 cc
Engine Water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts, dry sump lubrication Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, 4 valve, Liquid Cooled, Spark Ignition
Engine Starting -- Electric Push Start and Kick Start
Engine Lubrication Dry sump --
Clutch Multiple-disc clutch in oil bath, mechanically operated --
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Cooling System -- Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 33.6 bhp @ 9500 rpm 24.80 bhp @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 28 Nm @ 7500 rpm 23 Nm @7000 rpm
Transmission 6 speed 6 speed, Synchronous Mesh Overdrive
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Tyres
Front 120/70-R17 110/90-16
Rear 160/60-R17 140/90-15
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front Single disc, diameter 300 mm, 4-piston fixed caliper, radially bolted (Expected) Single 280 mm with 2 Piston Caliper
Rear Single disc, diameter 240 mm, single-piston floating caliper (Expected) Drum, 130 mm
Suspension
Front Upside down forks Hydraulic Telescope 41 mm
Rear Cast alloy swing arm Twin Hydraulic with Spring
Colors Available
Colors Black Copper White and Candy Mettallic Glossy Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 2257 mm
Width -- 780 mm
Height -- 1140 mm
Weight 130 kg 179 kg
Wheelbase 1364 mm 1545 mm
Ground Clearance -- 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 18 litres
Overview
About TVS Akula was displayed at the Auto Expo 2016 as a concept model to signify the 33 years of TVS Read More The Commando Classic is the flagship model of UM Motorcycles in India. It was launched alongsid Read More
Features Stiff space frame chassis with lightweight carbon fibre bodywork
Powerful heat management system
On-board gyro cameras
Steering damper & fully functional digital speedo
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4753