Suzuki Gixxer SF SP vs Yamaha FZ-S FI V3

Compare Specifications of Gixxer SF SP and FZ-S FI V3

Selected Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer SF SP
Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha FZ-S FI V3
Yamaha FZ-S FI V3

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 154.90 cc 149.00 cc
Engine 4-Stroke. 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Engine Starting Electric & Kick Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multi-disc
Fuel System Carburetor Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System -- Air cooled
Maximum Power 14.8ps@8000 rpm 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14Nm@6000rpm 12.8 N.m @ 6000 rpm
Transmission -- Constant mesh, 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Battery Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah --
Frame -- Diamond
Headlamp 12 V 35/35 W LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 - Tubeless 100/80-17M/C 52P
Rear 140/60R - 17 - Radial Tubeless 140/60R17M/C 63P
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc ABS
Rear Disc Disc Brake
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic fork
Rear Swing Arm, Mono Suspension Swingarm
Colors Available
Colors Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black --


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 1990 mm
Width 785 mm 780 mm
Height 1085 mm 1080 mm
Weight 139 kg 137 kg
Wheelbase 1330 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 12.8 litres
Overview
About Gixxer SF SP is the limited edition version of the Gixxer SF. This all new motorcycle is loaded Read More Check the latest and other variants
Read More
Features Stylish SP Emblem & Sporty Graphics
Clear Lens LED Tail Lamp
Alluminium Muffler Cover
Smart Digital Instrumentation
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Excellent power and torque figures
- Comfortable for long rides
- Stylish design and attractive graphics
- Efficient fuel economy
- High-quality build and durability
--
Cons - Might be a bit pricey for some buyers
- Carburetor fuel system may require regular cleaning and maintenance
- Lack of a liquid-cooled engine could be a potential downside for some riders
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1901