Suzuki Gixxer SF SP vs Suzuki Gixxer SP

Compare Specifications of Gixxer SF SP and Gixxer SP

Selected Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer SF SP
Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SP
Suzuki Gixxer SP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 154.90 cc 154.90 cc
Engine 4-Stroke. 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric & Kick Electric, Kick
Fuel System Carburetor Carburettor
Maximum Power 14.8ps@8000 rpm 14.8ps@8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14Nm@6000rpm 14Nm@6000rpm
Transmission -- 5 Speed, MT
Battery Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah
Headlamp 12 V 35/35 W 12 V 35/35 W
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 - Tubeless 100/80 - 17 - Tubeless
Rear 140/60R - 17 - Radial Tubeless 100/80 - 17 - Tubeless
Brakes
Front Disc Disc
Rear Disc Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic
Rear Swing Arm, Mono Suspension Telescopic
Colors Available
Colors Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 2050 mm
Width 785 mm 785 mm
Height 1085 mm 1030 mm
Weight 139 kg 139 kg
Wheelbase 1330 mm 1030 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 12 litres
Overview
About Gixxer SF SP is the limited edition version of the Gixxer SF. This all new motorcycle is loaded Read More Check the latest & other variants
Suzuki Read More
Features Stylish SP Emblem & Sporty Graphics
Clear Lens LED Tail Lamp
Alluminium Muffler Cover
Smart Digital Instrumentation
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Excellent power and torque figures
- Comfortable for long rides
- Stylish design and attractive graphics
- Efficient fuel economy
- High-quality build and durability
- Balanced performance with good power and torque output
- Stylish design and great build quality
- Excellent ride comfort and handling
- Reliable braking system
- Easy to maintain
Cons - Might be a bit pricey for some buyers
- Carburetor fuel system may require regular cleaning and maintenance
- Lack of a liquid-cooled engine could be a potential downside for some riders
- Not the most powerful bike in its segment
- Limited color options
- Fuel efficiency could be better

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6177