Suzuki Gixxer SF BS6 vs UM Max 150

Compare Specifications of Gixxer SF BS6 and Max 150

Selected Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer SF BS6
Suzuki Gixxer SF BS6

Brand:

Model:

UM Max 150
UM Max 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 155.00 cc 149.00 cc
Engine 4-Stroke, 1-cylinder, Air cooled SOHC 1 Cylinder, 4 Stroke
Engine Starting Electric Electric / Kick
Fuel System Fuel Injection Carburator
Ignition -- CDI
Cooling System Air Cooling Air
Maximum Power 13.6 ps @ 8000 rpm --
Maximum Torque 13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm --
Transmission 5 Speed, MT 5 Speed with Clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Top Speed 120 kmph --
Battery Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 45 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17M/C 52P --
Rear 140/60R17M/C 63P --
Wheel / RIM Cast Alloy --
Brakes
Front Disc Disc
Rear Disc Drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic Hydraulic Telescopic
Rear Swing arm Dual Spiral Shock
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Triton Blue
Metallic Sonic Silver/ Pearl Blaze Orange
Glass Sparkle Black
Red, Black, Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2025 mm 1980 mm
Width 715 mm 823 mm
Height 1035 mm 1210 mm
Weight -- 96 kg
Kerb Weight 148 --
Seat Height 795 --
Wheelbase 1340 mm 1250 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres --
Overview
About The Suzuki Gixxer SF BS6 is a popular bike known for its impressive performance and reliability Read More --
Features - Bluetooth enabled digital console
- Suzuki Ride Connect
- Ultra Light And Robust 155 CC Engine
- Aerodynamic Design
- Clip-On Handle Bar
- Split Seat
- Digital Instrumentation
- Twin Muffler
- Rear Tyre Hugger
- Stiffer Front Suspension
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Robust and powerful 155 cc engine
- Stylish, aerodynamic design
- Modern features like Suzuki Ride Connect and Bluetooth enabled digital console
- Reliable braking system
- Comfortable for long rides
--
Cons - Mileage could be better
- Suspension might feel too stiff for some riders.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8647