Suzuki Gixxer ABS vs Suzuki Gixxer SP

Compare Specifications of Gixxer ABS and Gixxer SP

Selected Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer ABS
Suzuki Gixxer ABS

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SP
Suzuki Gixxer SP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 154.90 cc 154.90 cc
Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, Air-cooled 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Kick, Electric Electric, Kick
Fuel System Carburetor Carburettor
Cooling System air cooled --
Maximum Power 14.8 ps @ 8000 rpm 14.8ps@8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14 Nm @ 6000 rpm 14Nm@6000rpm
Transmission 5 Speed, MT 5 Speed, MT
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Battery Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah
Headlamp 12V 35/35W 12 V 35/35 W
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 100/80 - 17 - Tubeless 100/80 - 17 - Tubeless
Rear 140/60R - 17 - Radial Tubeless 100/80 - 17 - Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front Disc Disc
Rear Disc Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic
Rear Swing Arm, Mono Suspension Telescopic
Colors Available
Colors Candy Sonoma Red/Metallic Sonic Silver, Glass Sparkle Black, metallic Triton Blue Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 2050 mm
Width 785 mm 785 mm
Height 1030 mm 1030 mm
Weight 135 kg 139 kg
Wheelbase 1330 mm 1030 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 12 litres
Overview
About Check the latest variant
Suzuki Gixxer B Read More
Check the latest & other variants
Suzuki Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Solid build quality and attractive design.
- Robust and efficient engine.
- Excellent ride quality and comfort.
- Array of features that enhance convenience.
- Balanced performance with good power and torque output
- Stylish design and great build quality
- Excellent ride comfort and handling
- Reliable braking system
- Easy to maintain
Cons - Price may seem a bit high for some.
- Mileage could have been slightly better.
- Not the most powerful bike in its segment
- Limited color options
- Fuel efficiency could be better

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7687