Suzuki Gixxer 150 vs Yamaha YZF R15 V3

Compare Specifications of Gixxer 150 and YZF R15 V3

Selected Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha YZF R15 V3
Yamaha YZF R15 V3

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 154.90 cc 155.10 cc
Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve Liquid-Cooled SOHC, 4 Valve Engine
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Start Electric
Clutch -- Wet Multiple-disc
Fuel System Carburetor Fuel Injection
Ignition -- Transistor controlled ignition
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid -Cooled
Maximum Power 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm 19.3 PS @ 10000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14Nm@6000 rpm 15N.m @ 8500 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed, MT 6-speed, Constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 118 kmph --
Battery 12V 12V, 4.0Ah
Frame Diamond Type Deltabox
Headlamp 12V 35/35W LED
Taillamp LED LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage 63 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17-Tubeless MRF/NYLOGRIP ZAPPER-FX1 100/80-17M/C 52P Tubeless
Rear 140/60R-17-Tubeless MRF/NYLOGRIP ZAPPER-S 140/70-17M/C 66H Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Cast Alloy
Brakes
Front Single Disc Hydraulic single disc 282 mm
Rear Drum Hydraulic single disc 220 mm
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic fork
Rear Swing Arm, Mono Suspension Monocross
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White DEEP PURPLISH BLUE
MAT BLACK 2
BLACK METTALIC X


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 1990 mm
Width 785 mm 725 mm
Height 1030 mm 1135 mm
Weight 135 kg 139 kg kg
Seat Height -- 815
Wheelbase 1330 mm 1325 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 11 litres
Overview
About Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More Yamaha R15 V3 is the third iteration of the all-time famous entry level sports bike YZF-R15. Th Read More
Features -- - Slipper clutch
- LCD instrument cluster
- USB charging port
- LED Headlights and Taillamps
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
--
Cons - Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4425