Suzuki Gixxer 150 vs Yamaha FZ-S FI V3

Compare Specifications of Gixxer 150 and FZ-S FI V3

Selected Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha FZ-S FI V3
Yamaha FZ-S FI V3

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 154.90 cc 149.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Start Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multi-disc
Fuel System Carburetor Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Air Cooled Air cooled
Maximum Power 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm 13.2 PS @ 8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14Nm@6000 rpm 12.8 N.m @ 6000 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed, MT Constant mesh, 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 118 kmph --
Battery 12V --
Frame Diamond Type Diamond
Headlamp 12V 35/35W LED
Taillamp LED LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage 63 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17-Tubeless 100/80-17M/C 52P
Rear 140/60R-17-Tubeless 140/60R17M/C 63P
Wheel / RIM Cast Alloy
Brakes
Front Single Disc ABS
Rear Drum Disc Brake
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic fork
Rear Swing Arm, Mono Suspension Swingarm
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White --


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 1990 mm
Width 785 mm 780 mm
Height 1030 mm 1080 mm
Weight 135 kg 137 kg
Wheelbase 1330 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 12.8 litres
Overview
About Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More Check the latest and other variants
Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
--
Cons - Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1587