Suzuki Gixxer 150 vs Suzuki Gixxer SP

Compare Specifications of Gixxer 150 and Gixxer SP

Selected Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SP
Suzuki Gixxer SP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 154.90 cc 154.90 cc
Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve 4-Stroke, 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Start Electric, Kick
Fuel System Carburetor Carburettor
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm 14.8ps@8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14Nm@6000 rpm 14Nm@6000rpm
Transmission 5 Speed, MT 5 Speed, MT
Top Speed 118 kmph --
Battery 12V Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah
Frame Diamond Type --
Headlamp 12V 35/35W 12 V 35/35 W
Taillamp LED LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage 63 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17-Tubeless 100/80 - 17 - Tubeless
Rear 140/60R-17-Tubeless 100/80 - 17 - Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Cast --
Brakes
Front Single Disc Disc
Rear Drum Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic
Rear Swing Arm, Mono Suspension Telescopic
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 2050 mm
Width 785 mm 785 mm
Height 1030 mm 1030 mm
Weight 135 kg 139 kg
Wheelbase 1330 mm 1030 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 12 litres
Overview
About Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More Check the latest & other variants
Suzuki Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
- Balanced performance with good power and torque output
- Stylish design and great build quality
- Excellent ride comfort and handling
- Reliable braking system
- Easy to maintain
Cons - Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.
- Not the most powerful bike in its segment
- Limited color options
- Fuel efficiency could be better

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7130