Suzuki Gixxer 150 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Compare Specifications of Gixxer 150 and Gixxer SF SP

Selected Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer 150
Suzuki Gixxer 150

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SF SP
Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 154.90 cc 154.90 cc
Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, air-cooled SOHC, 2 Valve 4-Stroke. 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Start Electric & Kick
Fuel System Carburetor Carburetor
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 10.4 KW @ 8000 rpm 14.8ps@8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 14Nm@6000 rpm 14Nm@6000rpm
Transmission 5 Speed, MT --
Top Speed 118 kmph --
Battery 12V Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah
Frame Diamond Type --
Headlamp 12V 35/35W 12 V 35/35 W
Taillamp LED LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage 63 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17-Tubeless 100/80-17 - Tubeless
Rear 140/60R-17-Tubeless 140/60R - 17 - Radial Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Cast --
Brakes
Front Single Disc Disc
Rear Drum Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic Telescopic
Rear Swing Arm, Mono Suspension Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Oort Gray, Candy Antares Red, Glass Sparkle Black, Metallic Triton Blue, Pearl Mirage White Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 2050 mm
Width 785 mm 785 mm
Height 1030 mm 1085 mm
Weight 135 kg 139 kg
Wheelbase 1330 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 12 litres
Overview
About Suzuki Gixxer is the highest selling 150 class motorcycle from the Japanese bike makers, which Read More Gixxer SF SP is the limited edition version of the Gixxer SF. This all new motorcycle is loaded Read More
Features -- Stylish SP Emblem & Sporty Graphics
Clear Lens LED Tail Lamp
Alluminium Muffler Cover
Smart Digital Instrumentation
Pros and Cons
Pros - Impressive mileage of 63 km per litre.
- Robust build quality ensuring durability.
- Aerodynamic and attractive design.
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety.
- Versatile performance for all types of roads.
- Excellent power and torque figures
- Comfortable for long rides
- Stylish design and attractive graphics
- Efficient fuel economy
- High-quality build and durability
Cons - Absence of a rear disc brake.
- Limited fuel tank capacity of 12 litres.
- No liquid cooling system, reliant on air cooling only.
- Might be a bit pricey for some buyers
- Carburetor fuel system may require regular cleaning and maintenance
- Lack of a liquid-cooled engine could be a potential downside for some riders

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6228