Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition vs Suzuki V-Strom 650

Compare Specifications of Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition and V-Strom 650

Selected Bikes

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki V-Strom 650
Suzuki V-Strom 650

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 648.00 cc 645.00 cc
Engine Parallel twin, 4-stroke, single overhead cam, air/oil-cooled 90° V-TWIN, 4-STROKE, DOHC, LIQUID-COOLED
Engine Starting Electric ELECTRIC
Fuel System Fuel injection Fuel Injection
Ignition Digital spark ignition - TCI --
Cooling System Air/oil-cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 47 PS @ 7150 RPM --
Maximum Torque 52 NM @ 5250 RPM --
Transmission 6-speed constant mesh 6-SPEED CONSTANT MESH
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Battery 12 volt, 8 Ah Battery --
Frame Tubular steel frame with bolted trussing --
Headlamp 12V, H4-60/55W (Halogen) --
Taillamp 12V, P21/5W
Turn signal lamp 12V, 10W X 4nos
--
Tyres
Front 100/90-18 --
Rear 130/70-18 --
Wheel / RIM Spoke cast aluminium wheels
Brakes
Front 320 mm disc (ABS) TOKICO TWIN-PISTON CALIPERS, DUAL FLOATING 310MM DISCS, ABS
Rear 240 mm disc (ABS) NISSIN SINGLE-PISTON CALIPER, 260MM DISC WITH ABS
Suspension
Front 41 mm front fork, 110 mm travel 43MM TELESCOPIC FORKS WITH 150MM STROKE
Rear Twin coil-over shocks, 88 mm travel LINK TYPE, WITH ADJUSTABLE REBOUND AND SPRING PRELOAD
Colors Available
Colors -- CHAMPION YELLOW NO. 2 / GLASS SPARKLE BLACK


Physical Specs
Length 2122 mm 2275 mm
Width 1165 mm 835 mm
Height 789 mm 1405 mm
Weight -- 213 kg
Kerb Weight 202 --
Seat Height 804 --
Wheelbase 1400 mm 1560 mm
Ground Clearance 174 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.7 litres 20 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Accessories Sump Guard
Flyscreens
Heel Guards
Brace Pad
Bar end
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Classic design with modern features.
- Robust engine and high torque performance.
- Comfortable seating and ergonomics.
- Quality range of accessories.
--
Cons - Might be heavy for some riders.
- Limited fuel tank capacity for long-distance travel.
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1625