Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue vs Yamaha YZF R3

Compare Specifications of Classic Signals Airborne Blue and Yamaha YZF R3

Selected Bikes

Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue
Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha YZF R3
Yamaha YZF R3

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 346.00 cc 321.00 cc
Engine Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air cooled, Liquid-cooled 2-cylinder DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Engine Starting Kick Electric start
Engine Lubrication -- Wet Sump
Clutch -- Wet, Multiplate
Fuel System Constant Vacuum Carburettor Fuel injection
Ignition -- TCI (Transistor controlled ignition)
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm 42 Ps @ 10750 rpm
Maximum Torque 28Nm @ 4000 rpm 30 Nm @ 900 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed Constant mesh; 6-speed transmission
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed -- 180 kmph
Frame Single down tube Diamond
Mileage
Highway Mileage -- 25 kmpl
City Mileage -- 17 kmpl
Overall Mileage -- 22 kmpl
Tyres
Front 90 / 90 - 19 110/70-17M/C 54H
Rear 110 / 80 - 18 140/70-17M/C 66H
Wheel / RIM Spoke Alloy
Brakes
Front 280 mm ventilated disc, double piston caliper Hydraulic, 298mm
Rear 240 mm ventilated disc, single piston caliper Hydraulic, 220mm
Suspension
Front 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel 41mm KYB® telescopic fork; 5.1 in of travel
Rear Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel KYB® single shock; 4.9 in of travel
Colors Available
Colors Airborne Blue Racing Blue and Magma Black


Physical Specs
Length 2160 mm 2090 mm
Width 790 mm 718 mm
Height 1090 mm 1135 mm
Weight 192 kg 166 kg
Wheelbase 1370 mm 1379 mm
Ground Clearance 135 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.5 litres 14 litres
Overview
About Check the other variant
Read More
Injected with the 'R' racing DNA from its older siblings, the Yamaha R3 is Yamaha's gift to Ind Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Vibrant and unique aesthetic design
- Robust engine with good performance
- Comfortable ride quality with efficient suspension system
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety
--
Cons - Some riders might find the bike a bit heavy at 192 kg
- Fuel efficiency could be improved for city commute
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8388