Regal Raptor Spyder DD350E-6 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Compare Specifications of Spyder DD350E-6 and Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Selected Bikes

Regal Raptor Spyder DD350E-6
Regal Raptor Spyder DD350E-6

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue
Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 320.00 cc 346.00 cc
Engine 2-Cylinder, 4-stroke, Water Cooled Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark, Aircooled
Engine Starting Electric start --
Engine Lubrication SAE 10 W/40 API SG Wet sump
Clutch Oil-bathing multi-plate clutch Wet, multi-plate
Fuel System Electronic Fuel injection --
Ignition CDI Transistorised Coil Ignition
Cooling System Water Cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 17.00 kW @ 8500rpm 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 22 Nm @ 6500 rpm 28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 5 Speed Manual Gearbox 5 Speed Constant Mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 140 kmph --
Battery 12 V -9 Ah, MF battery 12 volt, 8 Ah
Frame Metal Frame --
Headlamp 12 V -35 W / 35W 60 W / 55 W, HALOGEN
Taillamp 12 V -5 W / 21W 21 W / 5 W
Mileage
City Mileage -- 37 kmpl
Tyres
Front 90 / 90 x 21 90/90 - 19
Rear 160/ 80 x 16 110/90 - 18
Wheel / RIM Tubeless Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front Dual Disc 280 mm Disc, 2-Piston caliper
Rear Single Disc 240 mm Disc, Single piston caliper
Suspension
Front Telescopic Hydraulic Shock Absorbers Telescopic, 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear Telescopic Hydraulic Shock Absorbers Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2335 mm 2180 mm
Width 965 mm 790 mm
Height 1100 mm 1080 mm
Weight 184 kg 187 kg
Wheelbase 1660 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance 140 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About With the look of a custom manufactured cruiser motorcycle, the Regal Raptor Spyder DD350E-6 is Read More Check the other color variants
Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Timeless classic design
- Comfortable riding position
- Robust build quality
- Wide service network
Cons -- - Heavier than some competitors
- Lacks modern features like a digital console
- Fuel efficiency could be improved

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6170