Raptee Motors Mark 1 vs SR Motor SUR RON MX

Compare Specifications of Raptee Motors Mark 1 and SR Motor SUR RON MX

Selected Bikes

Raptee Motors Mark 1
Raptee Motors Mark 1

Brand:

Model:

SR Motor SUR RON MX
SR Motor SUR RON MX

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Range 200 Kms 100 km(@ 20km/h)
Charging Time 0 – 80% in 45 minutes --
Cooling System -- Air-cooled
Maximum Torque -- 200 Nm @ 4500 rpm
Transmission -- Belt + Chain
Gearshift type and transmission ratio : 1:7.6
Top Speed 150 kmph --
Battery 2.4 kWh 51.8V 25AH
Charger -- Constant current & voltage 58.8V-5A
Frame -- Aluminum alloy double cradles design
Headlamp -- German standard bicycle headlight
Taillamp -- German standard bicycle tail lamp
Tyres
Front -- 70/100-19
Rear -- 70/100-19
Wheel / RIM Spoke 19x1.4
Spoke
Weight distribution of Fr. Wheel axle : 24 kg
Weight distribution of Rr. Wheel axle : 26 kg
Brakes
Front -- Bilateral 4-piston hydraulic disc brake
Rear -- Bilateral 4-piston hydraulic disc brake
Suspension
Front -- Fr. Absorber : Double-tube telescopic shock absorber
Rear -- Rr. Absorber : Multi-link central shock absorber
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 1870 mm
Width -- 780 mm
Height -- 1040 mm
Weight -- 50 kg
Wheelbase -- 1260 mm
Ground Clearance -- 270 mm
Overview
About Showcased during AutoExpo 2020 Read More --
Features - Active and passive security
- Remote diagnostics
- Biometric access
- Smart helmet connectivity
- Navigation and geofencing
- Mobile phone controls
- Reverse mode
- OTA updated and Bluetooth connectivity
- Find My Bike
- Sleep Detection
- ICE Sounds
- Charge Prep & Charger Lookup
- Adaptive Driving Modes
--
Additional Details -- Max. load capability : 100 kg
single socket : IBN negative display dashboard
USB Power source : USB-2.1A single socket
Horn : European standard horn
Controller Type : 48/60V self-adaptable
Climbing ability : 35°
Forward inclining angle : 26°
Steering angle : 46°
Fr. Absorbers stroke : 200 mm
Rr. Absorber/Wheel stroke : 87/210 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9555