QJ Motor SRV 300 vs Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Compare Specifications of SRV 300 and Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Selected Bikes

QJ Motor SRV 300
QJ Motor SRV 300

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue
Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 296.00 cc 346.00 cc
Engine V-Twin liquid-cooled engine, SOHC, 4 Stroke 8 valves Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air cooled,
Engine Starting Electric Kick
Clutch Wet Clutch --
Fuel System EFI Constant Vacuum Carburettor
Ignition Electric --
Cooling System Liquid-cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 30.3HP@ 9000 RPM 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 26NM@ 5000 RPM 28Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 6 Speed 5 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Display Digital Display --
Frame Bassinet type Single down tube
Headlamp LED --
Tyres
Front 120/80-16 90 / 90 - 19
Rear 150/80-15 110 / 80 - 18
Wheel / RIM Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front Single Disc 280mm(ABS) 280 mm ventilated disc, double piston caliper
Rear Single Disc 240mm(ABS) 240 mm ventilated disc, single piston caliper
Suspension
Front Telescopic Upside-Down 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear Telescopic coil spring oil damped Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Black
Green
Red
Orange
Airborne Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2110 mm 2160 mm
Width 850 mm 790 mm
Height 1100 mm 1090 mm
Weight -- 192 kg
Kerb Weight 164 --
Seat Height 700 --
Wheelbase 1400 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.5 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About -- Check the other variant
Read More
Features - 13.5-litre fuel tank
- LED lighting
- Dual exhaust pipes
- Tubeless tyres
- Dual-tone tank
- Comfy Seat
- Digital Instrument Cluster

Dual-tone tank
Dual-tone tank
Digital Instrument Cluster
Digital Instrument Cluster
V-twin Performance Engine
V-twin Performance Engine
--
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Vibrant and unique aesthetic design
- Robust engine with good performance
- Comfortable ride quality with efficient suspension system
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety
Cons -- - Some riders might find the bike a bit heavy at 192 kg
- Fuel efficiency could be improved for city commute

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6452