MV Agusta Brutale Dragster 800 RC vs MV Agusta RVS 1

Compare Specifications of Brutale Dragster 800 RC and RVS 1

Selected Bikes

MV Agusta Brutale Dragster 800 RC
MV Agusta Brutale Dragster 800 RC

Brand:

Model:

MV Agusta RVS 1
MV Agusta RVS 1

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Engince Displacement 798.00 cc 798.00 cc
Engine Type Three cylinder, 4 stroke, 12 valve Three cylinder, 4 stroke, 12 valve
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Cooling System Cooling with separated liquid and oil radiators Cooling with separeted liquid and oil radiators
Maximum Power 140 hp @ 12500 rpm 140 hp @ 12500 rpm
Maximum Torque 87 Nm @ 10100 rpm 87 Nm @ 12800 rpm
Transmission six speed, constant mesh 6-Speed Constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 245 kmph 245 kmph
Battery 12 V - 8.6 Ah 12 V - 8.6 Ah
Frame ALS Steel tubular trellis ALS Steel tubular trellis
Ground Clearance 149 mm 149 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16.5 litres 16.5 litres
Mileage
Tyres
Front 120/70 - ZR 17 M/C (58 W) Front Pirelli MT 60 RS WF 120/70 - ZR 17 M/C
Rear 200/50 - ZR 17 M/C (75 W) Rear Pirelli MT 60 RS WR 180/55 - ZR 17 M/C
Wheelbase 1380 mm 1380 mm
Brakes
Front Double floating disc with diameter 320 mm with steel braking disc and flange Double floating disc with 320 mm diameter, with steel Braking Bat Fly disks
Rear Single steel disc with diameter 220 mm Single Wave steel disc with diameter 220 mm
Suspension
Front Marzocchi “UPSIDE DOWN” telescopic hydraulic fork Marzocchi “UPSIDE DOWN” telescopic hydraulic fork in DLC treated aluminium
Rear Progressive Sachs, single shock absorber with rebound and compression damping and spring preload adjustment Progressive Sachs, single shock absorber with rebound and compression damping and spring preload adjustment
Colors Available
Colors RED, PEARL RC WHITE, GREEN METAL CARBON BLACK / METAL ANTHRACITE


Physical Specs
Width 825 mm 810 mm
Height -- --
Length 2,060 mm 2,025 mm
Weight 168 kg 168 kg

Overview
Special Features -- --




Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name:

Comment:

386 Enter the numbers here: