KTM RC 390 vs Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Compare Specifications of RC 390 and Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Selected Bikes

KTM RC 390
KTM RC 390

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue
Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 373.20 cc 346.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder 4 stroke water cooled engine Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air cooled,
Engine Starting Electric starter Kick
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps --
Clutch Wet multi-disc clutch / mechanically operated --
Fuel System -- Constant Vacuum Carburettor
Ignition Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment --
Cooling System Liquid cooling system, continuous circulation of cooling liquid with water pump Air Cooled
Maximum Power 44 hp 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 28Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 6 speed, claw shifted 5 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Battery 12V/6Ah --
Frame Tubular space frame made from steel, powder -coated Single down tube
Tyres
Front -- 90 / 90 - 19
Rear -- 110 / 80 - 18
Wheel / RIM 17 inch cast light alloy wheels Spoke
Brakes
Front 300 mm Disc brake with four pot brake caliper 280 mm ventilated disc, double piston caliper
Rear 230 mm Disc brake with one-pot brake caliper, floating brake discs 240 mm ventilated disc, single piston caliper
Suspension
Front 125 mm 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear 150 mm Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Airborne Blue


Physical Specs
Length -- 2160 mm
Width -- 790 mm
Height 820 mm 1090 mm
Weight 147 kg 192 kg
Wheelbase 1340 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance 178.5 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 9.5 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About The KTM RC 390 is a high-performance sports bike that is designed to deliver an exhilarating ri Read More Check the other variant
Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Vibrant and unique aesthetic design
- Robust engine with good performance
- Comfortable ride quality with efficient suspension system
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety
Cons -- - Some riders might find the bike a bit heavy at 192 kg
- Fuel efficiency could be improved for city commute

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6463