KTM RC 390 2022 vs Yezdi Adventure Camo

Compare Specifications of RC 390 2022 and Adventure Camo

Selected Bikes

KTM RC 390 2022
KTM RC 390 2022

Brand:

Model:

Yezdi Adventure Camo
Yezdi Adventure Camo

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 373.27 cc 334.00 cc
Engine Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI 4 stroke Engine Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Liquid Cooled, DOHC
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Clutch PASC™ antihopping clutch, mechanically operated --
Fuel System -- Electronic Fuel Injection
Cooling System Liquid cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 43.5 PS @ 9000 rpm 30.20 PS
Maximum Torque 37 Nm @ 7000 rpm 29.90 NM
Transmission 6-speed Constant Mesh, 6 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Display TFT Display LCD Display
Frame Steel trellis frame, powder coated Double Cradle
Chain 520 X-Ring --
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front -- 90/90 – 21"
Rear -- 130/80 – 17"
Wheel / RIM New bionic wheel design with fewer spokes Spoke
Brakes
Front 320 mm Four-piston radial fixed calliper 320 MM Disc With Floating Caliper And ABS
Rear 230 mm Single-piston floating calliper 240 MM Disc With Floating Caliper And ABS
ABS Bosch 9.1MP Two Channel ABS (Supermoto ABS) --
Suspension
Front WP APEX 43
Suspension Travel: 120 mm
Telescopic Fork & Coil Spring
Rear WP APEX - Monoshock
Suspension Travel: 120 mm
Mono Shock Absorbers With Coil Spring & Linkage Mechanism
Colors Available
Colors -- Ranger Camo


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 160 kg 188 kg
Seat Height 824 815
Wheelbase -- 1465 mm
Ground Clearance 158 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.7 litres 15.5 litres
Overview
Features - MTC (Motorcycle Traction Control)
- Supermoto ABS mODE
- Quickshifter Plus
- New Foldable Mirrors
- MotoGP Inspired
- New Ultra Lightweight Framework
- New Ride by Wire System
--
Additional Details Co2 Emissions : 81 g/km
EMS : Bosch EMS with RBW
Fuel Consumption: 3.46 l/100 km
Steering Head Angle: 66.5 °
Exhaust : Single side exhaust

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6636