KTM Duke 890 R 2020 vs Suzuki V-Strom 1050

Compare Specifications of Duke 890 R 2020 and V-Strom 1050

Selected Bikes

KTM Duke 890 R 2020
KTM Duke 890 R 2020

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki V-Strom 1050
Suzuki V-Strom 1050

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 890.00 cc 1037.00 cc
Engine 2-cylinder, 4-stroke, parallel twin 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, DOHC, 90˚ V-Twin
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 oil pumps Wet-sump
Clutch PASC antihopping clutch, mechanically operated --
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Ignition -- Electronic ignition
Cooling System Liquid cooled with water/oil heat exchanger Liquid Cooling
Maximum Power 119 hp 107.4 PS @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque 99 Nm 100 Nm @ 6000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed 6-speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Display TFT DISPLAY --
Frame Chromium-Molybdenum-Steel frame using the engine as stressed element, powder coated --
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front -- 110/80R19M/C 59V
Rear -- 150/70R17M/C 69V
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 320 mm 2 x Brembo Stylema Monobloc four piston, radially mounted caliper Tokico, 4-piston calipers, twin disc
Rear 240 mm Brembo single-piston floating calliper, brake disc Nissin, 2-piston, single disc
Suspension
Front 140 mm WP APEX 43 Inverted telescopic, coil spring, oil damped
Rear 150 mm WP APEX Monoshock Link type, coil spring, oil damped
Colors Available
Colors -- Glass Sparkle Black
Solid Iron Gray


Physical Specs
Length -- 2265 mm
Width -- 870 mm
Height -- 1515 mm
Weight 166 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 236
Seat Height 834 855
Wheelbase -- 1555 mm
Ground Clearance 206 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 20 litres
Overview
About -- Showcased during AutoExpo 2020 Read More
Features -- --
Additional Details EMS : Bosch EMS with RBW
CO2 Emissions : 110 g/km
Fuel Consumption : 4.74 l/100 km
ABS : Bosch 9.1 MP (incl. Cornering-ABS and super moto mode)
Chain : 520 X-Ring
Sterring Head Angle : 65.7 °
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9533