KTM Duke 690 vs Suzuki SV650 ABS

Compare Specifications of Duke 690 and SV650 ABS

Selected Bikes

KTM Duke 690
KTM Duke 690

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki SV650 ABS
Suzuki SV650 ABS

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 690.00 cc 645.00 cc
Engine Single-cylinder, 4-stroke, spark-ignition engine, liquid-cooled 4-stroke, 2-cylinder, liquid-cooled, DOHC, 90° V-Twin
Engine Starting -- Electric start
Engine Lubrication -- Wet Sump
Clutch -- Wet Multi Disc
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- Electronic ignition (Transistorized)
Cooling System -- Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 69bhp @ 7,500rpm --
Maximum Torque 70.5 Nm @ 5,500rpm --
Transmission 6-speed, claw shifted 6-Speed Constant Mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 185 kmph --
Frame -- Trellis Frame
Mileage
Standard Test Conditions 25 kmpl --
Tyres
Front -- 120/70ZR17M/C (58W), Tubeless
Rear -- 160/60ZR17M/C (69W), Tubeless
Brakes
Front Disc brake 320 mm, with single-piston brake caliper, floating Twin Disc
Rear Disc brake 240 mm, with single-piston brake caliper, floating Single Disc
Suspension
Front 135 mm, WP Suspension 4618 EM with Pro‑Lever linkage Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped
Rear 135 mm, WP Suspension 4618 EM with Pro‑Lever linkage Link type, coil spring, oil damped, spring preload adjustable
Colors Available
Colors Orange, White, black Metallic Triton Blue / Pearl Glacier White (AGQ), Glass Sparkle Black (YVB) and Metallic Mat Black No.2 (YKV)


Physical Specs
Length -- 2140 mm
Width -- 760 mm
Height -- 1090 mm
Weight -- 196 kg
Wheelbase 1466 mm 1445 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.8 litres 14.5 litres
Overview
About "The essence of motorcycling," quotes KTM. Mating all demands together, a true all-rounder from Read More --
Features Dynamic cornering fun
Low fuel consumption
Polished rid dynamics
Refined single cylinder
--
Pros and Cons
Pros Powerful engine
Smooth to ride
An all-rounder
Economical to carry on
--
Cons A bit knotty --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4629