KTM Duke 690 vs Moto Guzzi V7 III Stone

Compare Specifications of Duke 690 and V7 III Stone

Selected Bikes

KTM Duke 690
KTM Duke 690

Brand:

Model:

Moto Guzzi V7 III Stone
Moto Guzzi V7 III Stone

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 690.00 cc 744.00 cc
Engine Single-cylinder, 4-stroke, spark-ignition engine, liquid-cooled Four stroke, V twin, longitudinally mounted, OHV, 2 valves with light alloy pushrods and rockers
Engine Starting -- Electric
Clutch -- Single disc, dry with cush drive
Ignition -- Magneti Marelli electronic digital
Cooling System -- Air Cooled
Maximum Power 69bhp @ 7,500rpm 51 bhp @ 6200 rpm
Maximum Torque 70.5 Nm @ 5,500rpm 60 Nm @ 4900 rpm
Transmission 6-speed, claw shifted 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 185 kmph --
Battery -- 12 V / 14 Ah
Frame -- Double cradle tubular frame in ALS steel with detachable elements
Mileage
Standard Test Conditions 25 kmpl --
Tyres
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc brake 320 mm, with single-piston brake caliper, floating Single 320 mm disc 2 piston caliper
Rear Disc brake 240 mm, with single-piston brake caliper, floating Single 260 mm disc 2 piston caliper
Suspension
Front 135 mm, WP Suspension 4618 EM with Pro‑Lever linkage 40 mm hydraulic telescopic fork
Rear 135 mm, WP Suspension 4618 EM with Pro‑Lever linkage die cast light alloy swing arm with 2 shock absorbers with adjustable spring preload
Colors Available
Colors Orange, White, black Nero Ruvido, Azzuro Electrico, Verde Camouflage, Giallo Energico


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Height -- 1110 mm
Weight -- 193 kg
Wheelbase 1466 mm --
Ground Clearance -- 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.8 litres 21 litres
Overview
About "The essence of motorcycling," quotes KTM. Mating all demands together, a true all-rounder from Read More --
Features Dynamic cornering fun
Low fuel consumption
Polished rid dynamics
Refined single cylinder
--
Pros and Cons
Pros Powerful engine
Smooth to ride
An all-rounder
Economical to carry on
--
Cons A bit knotty --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5861