KTM 990 Adventure R vs Yamaha XV950 Racer

Compare Specifications of 990 Adventure R and XV950 Racer

Selected Bikes

KTM 990 Adventure R
KTM 990 Adventure R

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XV950 Racer
Yamaha XV950 Racer

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 999.00 cc 942.00 cc
Engine 2-cylinder, 4-stroke, spark-ignition engine, 75° V arrangement, liquid-cooled 4-stroke, air-cooled, 4-valves, SOHC, V-type 2-cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric start
Engine Lubrication Dry-sump lubrication with 2 rotor pumps Wet Sump
Clutch Wet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operated Wet, Multiple Disc
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment TCI
Cooling System Liquid cooling system, continuous circulation of cooling liquid with water pump Air Cooled
Maximum Power 84.5 kW (113.3 hp) 52 Bhp @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 79.5 Nm @ 3000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed, claw shifted 5-Speed Belt Driven
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Frame Tubular space frame made from chrome molybdenum steel, powder-coated Double Cradle
Tyres
Front -- 100/90-19M/C 57H (Tubeless)
Rear -- 150/80B16M/C 71H (Tubeless)
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Twin-disc brake with floating brake calipers and brake discs Hydraulic single disc, Ø 298 mm
Rear Single-disc brake with floating brake caliper and brake disc Hydraulic single disc, Ø 298 mm
Suspension
Front WP Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PA Telescopic forks, Ø 41 mm
Rear WP Suspension PDS 5018 DCC PA Swingarm with 110 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Matt Grey and 60th Anniversary Edition


Physical Specs
Length -- 2295 mm
Width -- 775 mm
Height 905 mm 1160 mm
Weight 207 kg 251 kg
Wheelbase 1570 mm 1570 mm
Ground Clearance 301 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 20 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The next to the 990 Adventure. The 990 Adventure R is mated with all technical specifications o Read More --
Features -- --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1775