KTM 890 Adventure 2023 vs Suzuki GSX R1000

Compare Specifications of 890 Adventure 2023 and Suzuki GSX R1000

Selected Bikes

KTM 890 Adventure 2023
KTM 890 Adventure 2023

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki GSX R1000
Suzuki GSX R1000

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 889.00 cc 999.00 cc
Engine 2-cylinder, 4-stroke, parallel twin 4-stroke, 4-cylinder, liquid-cooled, DOHC
Engine Starting Electric start Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 oil pumps --
Clutch PASC antihopping clutch, mechanically operated --
Ignition -- Digital/transistorized
Cooling System Liquid cooled with water/oil heat exchanger --
Maximum Power 103 Hp 191 hp (142 kW) @ 12,000 rpm
Maximum Torque 100 Nm 86lb ft @ 10,000rpm
Transmission 6-speed 6-speed constant mesh
Top Speed -- 288 kmph
Display TFT display --
Frame Chromium-Molybdenum-Steel frame using the engine as stressed element, powder coated --
Chain 520 X-Ring --
Mileage
Standard Test Conditions -- 15 kmpl
Tyres
Front -- 120/70ZR17M/C (58W), tubeless
Rear -- 190/50ZR17M/C (73W), tubeless
Wheel / RIM Spoke --
Brakes
Front 320 mm Disc ABS Disc, twin
Rear 260 mm Disc ABS Disc
Suspension
Front WP APEX 43 (200mm travel) Inverted telescopic, coil spring, oil damped
Rear WP APEX - Monoshock (200mm travel) Link type, coil spring, oil damped
Colors Available
Colors Orange white
Orange black
GLR(Metallic tritron Blue/Glass Splash white)


Physical Specs
Length -- 2045 mm
Width -- 720 mm
Height -- 1130 mm
Weight -- 203 kg
Seat Height 860 --
Wheelbase -- 1405 mm
Ground Clearance 233 mm 203 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 20 litres 17.5 litres
Overview
About -- Suzuki GSX R1000, a super class machine that still holds on the traditional quality and reputat Read More
Features - High end steering damper
- Smartphone connectivity

Ktm 890 Adventure 2023
High end steering damper

Ktm 890 Adventure 2023
TFT Display
Instrument cluster
4 stroke,4 cylindrical liquid cooled DOHC engine
Monoblock forged front brake calipers
Additional Details CO2 EMISSIONS : 110 g/km --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3804