KTM 390 Adventure vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Compare Specifications of 390 Adventure and Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Selected Bikes

KTM 390 Adventure
KTM 390 Adventure

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue
Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 373.00 cc 346.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark, Aircooled
Engine Starting Electric --
Engine Lubrication Wet sump Wet sump
Clutch PASC™ antihopping clutch, mechanically operated Wet, multi-plate
Ignition -- Transistorised Coil Ignition
Cooling System Liquid cooling Air Cooled
Maximum Power 42.9 Hp 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 37 Nm 28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed 5 Speed Constant Mesh
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Battery -- 12 volt, 8 Ah
Frame Steel trellis frame, powder coated --
Chain 520 X-Ring --
Headlamp -- 60 W / 55 W, HALOGEN
Taillamp -- 21 W / 5 W
Mileage
City Mileage -- 37 kmpl
Tyres
Front -- 90/90 - 19
Rear -- 110/90 - 18
Wheel / RIM Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front 320 mm Four-piston radial fixed calliper 280 mm Disc, 2-Piston caliper
Rear 230 mm Single-piston floating calliper 240 mm Disc, Single piston caliper
Suspension
Front -- Telescopic, 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear -- Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2180 mm
Width -- 790 mm
Height -- 1080 mm
Weight 158 kg 187 kg
Seat Height 855 --
Wheelbase -- 1370 mm
Ground Clearance 200 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14.5 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About The KTM 390 Adventure is a powerful and capable motorcycle that is designed for adventure enthu Read More Check the other color variants
Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Potent 373 cc engine provides exhilarating performance.
- Robust braking system instills confidence in various conditions.
- PASC antihopping clutch enhances control and smoothness.
- High ground clearance and steel trellis frame make it off-road ready.
- Aggressive yet functional design appeals to adventure enthusiasts.
- Timeless classic design
- Comfortable riding position
- Robust build quality
- Wide service network
Cons - Seat height might be challenging for shorter riders.
- The aggressive power output might be overwhelming for novice riders.
- Limited fuel tank capacity could affect long-distance travel.
- The bike's weight could be a factor in less agile handling in certain off-road conditions.
- Heavier than some competitors
- Lacks modern features like a digital console
- Fuel efficiency could be improved

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4024