KTM 250 Adventure 2022 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 BS6

Compare Specifications of 250 Adventure 2022 and Gixxer SF 250 BS6

Selected Bikes

KTM 250 Adventure 2022
KTM 250 Adventure 2022

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 BS6
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 BS6

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 248.80 cc 249.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine SOHC,4-Stroke, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled
Engine Starting Electric ELECTRIC
Engine Lubrication Wet sump --
Clutch PASC™ anti hopping clutch, mechanically operated --
Fuel System -- FUEL INJECTION TECHNOLOGY
Cooling System Liquid cooled Oil cooled
Maximum Power 29.5 PS 26.5 ps @ 9300 rpm
Maximum Torque 24 NM 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm
Transmission 6-speed 6 Speed, MT
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Top Speed 140 kmph 150 kmph
Display TFT Display --
Frame Steel trellis frame, powder coated --
Fork WP APEX 43 mm upside-down fork --
Chain 520 X-Ring --
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED LED
Mileage
Overall Mileage 30 kmpl 40 kmpl
Tyres
Front Tubeless MRF Mogrip Meteor-FM2 tires --
Rear Tubeless MRF Mogrip Meteor-FM2 tires --
Wheel / RIM 5 spoke cast wheels
Front : 19"inch front wheels
Rear : 17" inch rear wheels
BRUSHED FINISH ALLOY WHEELS
Brakes
Front 320 mm Four-piston radial fixed calliper 300 mm DISC
Rear 230 mm Single-piston floating calliper DISC
ABS Offroad ABS DUAL CHANNEL ABS
Suspension
Front WP APEX 43 STIFFER FRONT SUSPENSION
Rear WP APEX - Monoshock --
Colors Available
Colors Electronic Orange
Factory Racing Blue
Metallic Triton Blue
Metallic Matte Platinum Silver
Metallic Matte Black
Metallic Matte Stellar Blue
Metallic Matte Black No.2
Metallic Sonic Silver/ Metallic Triton Blue


Physical Specs
Length -- 2010 mm
Width -- 740 mm
Height -- 1035 mm
Weight 156 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 161
Seat Height 855 800
Wheelbase -- 1345 mm
Ground Clearance 200 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14.5 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The KTM 250 Adventure 2022 is a capable and versatile motorcycle that boasts a powerful 248c Read More The Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 BS6 is a powerful and stylish motorcycle that is designed to deliver a Read More
Features - Ultra-lightweight, yet extremely stable trellis frame
- Lightweight chassis and class-leading electronics
- Slipper Clutch
- Ride by Wire Process

Ktm 250 Adventure 2022
Frame

Ktm 250 Adventure 2022
Sub-Frame

Ktm 250 Adventure 2022
Footpegs

Ktm 250 Adventure 2022
Wheels

Ktm 250 Adventure 2022
Engine

Ktm 250 Adventure 2022
Exhaust

Ktm 250 Adventure 2022
Tall Windshield

Ktm 250 Adventure 2022
14.5L Fuel Tank

Ktm 250 Adventure 2022
Seats

Ktm 250 Adventure 2022
WP APEX Long-Travel Suspension

Ktm 250 Adventure 2022
Handlebar
- Straight Ahead Sports Bike
- Digital Instrumentation
- Twin Muffler
- Rear Tyre Hugger
- Suzuki Easy Start System
- Clip-on Handle Bars
- Wider Tyres
- Split Seat & Grab Rail

Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 BS6
Additional Details CO2 Emissions : 73 g/km
EMS : Bosch EMS
Fuel Consumption : 3.1 l/100 km
Steering Head Angle: 63.5 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 170 mm
Suspension Travel (Rear) : 177 mm
--
Accessories -- Tank Graphic
Wheel Rim Sticker
Dc Socket
Seat Cover
Tank Protector
Smoked Visor
Saddle Bag
Pros and Cons
Pros - Potent 248.8 cc engine offering a great balance of power and fuel efficiency.
- Advanced braking system with offroad ABS provides excellent stopping power.
- High-quality suspension ensures comfortable rides even on rough terrains.
- Feature-rich with TFT display, LED lamps, and ride-by-wire technology.
- Durable and lightweight trellis frame enhances manoeuvrability and handling.
- Powerful engine with impressive performance
- Multiple aesthetic choices
- Robust build quality
- Excellent ride comfort
- Convenient features like easy start system and digital instrumentation
Cons - High seat height might pose a challenge for shorter riders.
- Limited colour options may not cater to all aesthetic preferences.
- Higher price point compared to other motorcycles in the same category.
- Higher-end pricing in its category
- Mileage might be less for those seeking high fuel efficiency

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8817