KOMAKI XGT Charge vs SR Motor SUR RON MX

Compare Specifications of XGT Charge and SR Motor SUR RON MX

Selected Bikes

KOMAKI XGT Charge
KOMAKI XGT Charge

Brand:

Model:

SR Motor SUR RON MX
SR Motor SUR RON MX

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor 72 V --
Range 85 km per charge 100 km(@ 20km/h)
Charging Time 6-8 Hrs --
Cooling System -- Air-cooled
Maximum Torque -- 200 Nm @ 4500 rpm
Transmission -- Belt + Chain
Gearshift type and transmission ratio : 1:7.6
Battery 72 V/20-30 Ah 51.8V 25AH
Charger -- Constant current & voltage 58.8V-5A
Display Digital Display --
Frame -- Aluminum alloy double cradles design
Headlamp LED WITH DRL German standard bicycle headlight
Taillamp -- German standard bicycle tail lamp
Tyres
Front Tubeless 90x90x12 70/100-19
Rear Tubeless 90x90x12 70/100-19
Wheel / RIM Alloy Rim 19x1.4
Spoke
Weight distribution of Fr. Wheel axle : 24 kg
Weight distribution of Rr. Wheel axle : 26 kg
Brakes
Front Disc Brake Bilateral 4-piston hydraulic disc brake
Rear Drum Brake Bilateral 4-piston hydraulic disc brake
Suspension
Front Telescopic Shock Absorber Fr. Absorber : Double-tube telescopic shock absorber
Rear Hydraulic Shock Absorber Rr. Absorber : Multi-link central shock absorber
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 1860 mm 1870 mm
Width 720 mm 780 mm
Height 1130 mm 1040 mm
Weight -- 50 kg
Wheelbase -- 1260 mm
Ground Clearance -- 270 mm
Overview
Features - Mobile Charging Point
- Comfortable Sitting
- Anti Theft Lock
- Lock By Remote
- Telescopic Shocher
- Noise Free Vehicle
- Self Diagnosis
- Regenerative Braking
- Repair Switch
- Reverse Park Facility
--
Additional Details Speed: Low Speed
Electricity Bill: 1.22 KWh/100 Km
Max. load capability : 100 kg
single socket : IBN negative display dashboard
USB Power source : USB-2.1A single socket
Horn : European standard horn
Controller Type : 48/60V self-adaptable
Climbing ability : 35°
Forward inclining angle : 26°
Steering angle : 46°
Fr. Absorbers stroke : 200 mm
Rr. Absorber/Wheel stroke : 87/210 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6392