Kawasaki Ninja 400 vs KTM 390 Adventure

Compare Specifications of Ninja 400 and 390 Adventure

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Ninja 400
Kawasaki Ninja 400

Brand:

Model:

KTM 390 Adventure
KTM 390 Adventure

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 399.00 cc 373.00 cc
Engine Liquid-Cooled Parallel Twin Engine 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric Start Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- PASC™ antihopping clutch, mechanically operated
Fuel System Fuel Injection --
Ignition Digital Ignition --
Cooling System Liquid cooled Liquid cooling
Maximum Power 45 bhp @ 10,000 rpm 42.9 Hp
Maximum Torque 38 Nm @ 8000 rpm 37 Nm
Transmission 6-Speed 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame Trellis, high-tensile steel Steel trellis frame, powder coated
Chain -- 520 X-Ring
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 110/70R17 M/C 54H --
Rear 150/60R17 M/C 66H --
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Single semi-floating 310 mm Petal Disc with Single balanced actuation dual-piston 320 mm Four-piston radial fixed calliper
Rear Single 220 mm Petal Disc with Dual Piston 230 mm Single-piston floating calliper
Suspension
Front 41 mm Kayaba fork --
Rear Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock with adjustable preload --
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Spark Black, Ebony KRT Edition and Lime Green --


Physical Specs
Length 1990 mm --
Width 710 mm --
Height 1120 mm --
Weight 168 kg 158 kg
Seat Height -- 855
Wheelbase 1370 mm --
Ground Clearance 140 mm 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 14.5 litres
Overview
About Ninja 400 is the answer from Kawasaki's house in response to the much popular KTM RC 390. Kawas Read More The KTM 390 Adventure is a powerful and capable motorcycle that is designed for adventure enthu Read More
Features - Kawasaki H2 Inspired Design and Styling
- 8 kg Lesser than Ninja 300
- Nissin ABS
--
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Potent 373 cc engine provides exhilarating performance.
- Robust braking system instills confidence in various conditions.
- PASC antihopping clutch enhances control and smoothness.
- High ground clearance and steel trellis frame make it off-road ready.
- Aggressive yet functional design appeals to adventure enthusiasts.
Cons -- - Seat height might be challenging for shorter riders.
- The aggressive power output might be overwhelming for novice riders.
- Limited fuel tank capacity could affect long-distance travel.
- The bike's weight could be a factor in less agile handling in certain off-road conditions.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2239