Kawasaki KLX 140 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Compare Specifications of KLX 140 and Apache RTR 160 4V

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki KLX 140
Kawasaki KLX 140

Brand:

Model:

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 144.00 cc 159.70 cc
Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, SOHC, Air-cooled SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled
Engine Starting -- Electric and Kick Start
Engine Lubrication -- Forced wet sump
Clutch -- Wet multi plate
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection: Bosch- Closed loop / Carb: UCAL/ Keihin VE CT6[A]
Ignition Digital DC-CDI Mapped ignition system / TCI - Transistor Controlled Ignition
Cooling System -- Oil cooler with Ram air assist
Maximum Power -- 16.8 Ps @ 8000 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 14.8 Nm @ 6500 rpm
Transmission Five-speed with wet multi-disc manual clutch 5-Speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Battery -- 12V, 9Ah
Frame High-Tensile steel, box-section perimeter Double cradle Split Synchro STIFF
Headlamp -- AHO 12V, 60/55W H4 bulb, with all-time ON LED position lamp
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 70/100-17 90/90-17 49P Tubeless
Rear 90/100-14 130/70-17 M/C 62P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Single 220mm petal disc with a dual-piston caliper Disc (270 mm Petal type)
Rear Single 186mm petal disc with single-piston caliper Drum (130 mm)/ Disc (200 mm Petal type)
Suspension
Front 33mm telescopic fork Telescopic Forks
Rear Uni-Trak linkage system and single shock with 5-way preload adjustability Monoshox
Colors Available
Colors Lime Green Red, Black and Blue


Physical Specs
Length 1821.18 mm 2050 mm
Width 789.94 mm 790 mm
Height 1049.02 mm 1050 mm
Weight 93 kg 147 kg
Wheelbase 1259.84 mm 1357 mm
Ground Clearance 236.22 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 5.6 litres 12 litres
Overview
About -- Apache RTR 160 4V is the upgraded version of the original Apache RTR 160. From head to tail, th Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Powerful engine with mapped ignition system
- Stylish design and LED lighting
- Comfortable suspension system
- Good fuel efficiency
- Great value for money
Cons -- - Slightly heavier than other bikes in its segment
- Non-ABS variant could be a drawback for some
- The seat could be more comfortable for long rides.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

455