Kawasaki KLR 650 CAMO vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

Compare Specifications of KLR 650 CAMO and Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki KLR 650 CAMO
Kawasaki KLR 650 CAMO

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 651.00 cc 648.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, 1-cylinder, DOHC, water-cooled Parallel twin, 4-stroke, single overhead cam, air/oil-cooled
Engine Starting -- Electric
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Ignition Electric CDI Digital spark ignition - TCI
Cooling System -- Air/oil-cooled
Maximum Power -- 47 PS @ 7150 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 52 NM @ 5250 RPM
Transmission 5-speed 6-speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Battery -- 12 volt, 8 Ah Battery
Frame Semi-double cradle, high-tensile steel Tubular steel frame with bolted trussing
Headlamp -- 12V, H4-60/55W (Halogen)
Taillamp -- 12V, P21/5W
Turn signal lamp 12V, 10W X 4nos
Tyres
Front 90/90x21 100/90-18
Rear 130/80x17 130/70-18
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front Single 254mm petal-type disc, 2-piston caliper 320 mm disc (ABS)
Rear Single 212mm disc, single-piston caliper 240 mm disc (ABS)
Suspension
Front 41mm telescopic fork 41 mm front fork, 110 mm travel
Rear Uni-Trak single-shock system with 5-way preload and stepless rebound damping Twin coil-over shocks, 88 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Matrix Camo Gray --


Physical Specs
Length 2296.16 mm 2122 mm
Width 960.12 mm 1165 mm
Height 1348.74 mm 789 mm
Weight 196 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 202
Seat Height -- 804
Wheelbase 1480.82 mm 1400 mm
Ground Clearance 210.82 mm 174 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 23 litres 13.7 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Accessories -- Sump Guard
Flyscreens
Heel Guards
Brace Pad
Bar end
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Classic design with modern features.
- Robust engine and high torque performance.
- Comfortable seating and ergonomics.
- Quality range of accessories.
Cons -- - Might be heavy for some riders.
- Limited fuel tank capacity for long-distance travel.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1953