Jawa Perak vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Compare Specifications of Perak and Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Selected Bikes

Jawa Perak
Jawa Perak

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue
Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 334.00 cc 346.00 cc
Engine Single Cylinder, Four Stroke, Liquid Cooled, SI Engine, DOHC Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark, Aircooled
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate
Fuel System Fuel Injection --
Ignition -- Transistorised Coil Ignition
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 30 BHP 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 31 Nm 28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission Constant Mesh 6 Speed 5 Speed Constant Mesh
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Battery -- 12 volt, 8 Ah
Frame Double cradle tubular --
Headlamp -- 60 W / 55 W, HALOGEN
Taillamp -- 21 W / 5 W
Mileage
City Mileage -- 37 kmpl
Tyres
Front 100/90-18 90/90 - 19
Rear 140/70-17 110/90 - 18
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front 280 mm disc with floating caliper and ABS 280 mm Disc, 2-Piston caliper
Rear 240 mm disc with floating caliper and ABS 240 mm Disc, Single piston caliper
Suspension
Front Telescopic Hydraulic Fork Telescopic, 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear Mono Shock Absorber, 7 Step Adjustable Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2180 mm
Width -- 790 mm
Height -- 1080 mm
Weight 179 kg 187 kg
Wheelbase 1485 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About Check the latest Perak variant - Perak BS6 Read More Check the other color variants
Read More
Features - single-seater bike --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Striking retro-inspired design
- Powerful and responsive engine
- Comfortable and ergonomically designed seating position
- Precise handling and maneuverability
- Advanced safety features including ABS
- Timeless classic design
- Comfortable riding position
- Robust build quality
- Wide service network
Cons - Limited seating capacity (single-seater) - Heavier than some competitors
- Lacks modern features like a digital console
- Fuel efficiency could be improved

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3200