Jawa Jawa 90th Anniversary Edition vs Royal Enfield Bullet 350 Twinspark

Compare Specifications of Jawa Jawa 90th Anniversary Edition and Bullet 350 Twinspark

Selected Bikes

Jawa Jawa 90th Anniversary Edition
Jawa Jawa 90th Anniversary Edition

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Bullet 350 Twinspark
Royal Enfield Bullet 350 Twinspark

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 293.00 cc 346.00 cc
Engine Single-cylinder, 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, DOHC Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark
Engine Starting -- Kick
Ignition -- Transistorised Coil Ignition
Cooling System Liquid cooled --
Maximum Power 27 PS 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 28 Nm 28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed 5 Speed Constant Mesh
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-down, 4-up
Top Speed -- 120 kmph
Battery -- 12 volt, 14 Ah
Frame -- Single downtube, using engine as stressed member
Mileage
Standard Test Conditions -- 45 kmpl
Tyres
Front 18-inch 3.25 x 19
Rear 17-inch 3.25 x 19
Wheel / RIM Spoke --
Brakes
Front 280 mm disc 7" Twin lead internal expanding drum breake
Rear 240 mm disc 153mm Drum, Single Lead Internal Expanding
Suspension
Front telescopic forks Telescopic, 35mm forks, 130mm travel
Rear dual shocks Twin shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 2140 mm
Width -- 800 mm
Height -- 1030 mm
Weight 170 kg 180 kg
Wheelbase -- 1370 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About -- The cheapest and the most respected RE machine which is currently in the outlet. Minimalist and Read More
Features -- Powerful 346 cc Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark engine.
Modern UCE with heavier crank-shaft.
Traditional mudguard with subframe.
Black tank with hand painted pin striping.
Hand painted pin strip tank, theme on tank gives specific looks.
Distinctive thump from silencer.
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Classic and timeless design.
- Robust 346 cc Twinspark engine.
- Comfortable ride quality.
- Impressive fuel efficiency.
Cons -- - Absence of disc brakes.
- Slightly heavy for new riders.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6531