Jawa 350 OHC vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Green

Compare Specifications of 350 OHC and Classic 350 Redditch Green

Selected Bikes

Jawa 350 OHC
Jawa 350 OHC

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Green
Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Green

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 397.20 cc 346.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, OHC, single cylinder engine Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark, Aircooled
Engine Starting Electric Push Start and Kick Start Electric or Kick
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate
Fuel System Carburettor --
Ignition -- Transistorised Coil Ignition
Cooling System Air Cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 20.4 kW @ 6500 rpm 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 30.6 Nm @ 5000 rpm 28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed Constant Mesh 5 Speed Constant Mesh
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 130 kmph --
Battery -- 12 volt, 8 Ah
Headlamp -- 60 W / 55 W, HALOGEN
Taillamp -- 21 W / 5 W
Mileage
City Mileage -- 37 kmpl
Tyres
Front -- 90/90 - 19
Rear -- 110/90 - 18
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front 280 mm disc with ABS 280 mm Disc, 2-Piston caliper
Rear Drum 160 mm 240 mm Disc, Single piston caliper
Suspension
Front -- Telescopic, 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear -- Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2180 mm
Width -- 790 mm
Height -- 1080 mm
Weight -- 187 kg
Wheelbase 1350 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12.5 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About -- Check the other color variants
Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Timeless, elegant design.
- Robust and durable build.
- Comfortable ride with superior suspension.
- Impressive city mileage.
- Suitable for riders of all skill levels.
Cons -- - Weight may be a concern for some riders.
- Classic design may not appeal to riders preferring modern aesthetics.
- Absence of liquid cooling system.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6585