Indian Chieftain Limited vs Indian Roadmaster Classic

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Indian Chieftain Limited vs Indian Roadmaster Classic

Compare Specifications of Indian Chieftain Limited and Roadmaster Classic

Selected Bikes

Indian Chieftain Limited Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Indian Roadmaster Classic Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	1811.00 cc	1811.00 cc
Engine	Thunder stroke 111	Thunder stroke 111
Engine Starting	Electric	Electric
Clutch	Wet, Multiplate	Wet, Multiplate
Fuel System	Closed loop fuel injection	Closed loop fuel injection
Cooling System	Air/ Liquid Cooled	Air/ Liquid Cooled
Maximum Torque	150 NM @ 2900 rpm	150 NM @ 2900 rpm
Transmission	6-speed	6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern	1-N-2-3-4-5-6	1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame	Cast Aluminium Frame	Cast Aluminium Frame

Tyres

Front	Dunlop American Elite 130/60B19 61H	Dunlop Elite 3 130/90B16 73H
Rear	Dunlop Elite 3 Multi-Compound 180/60R16 80H	Dunlop Elite 3 Multi-Compound 180/60R16 80H
Wheel / RIM	Cast aluminum wheels	Cast aluminum wheels

Brakes

Front	Dual / 300 mm Floating Rotor/ 4 Piston Caliper	Dual / 300 mm Floating Rotor/ 4 Piston Caliper
Rear	Single / 300 mm Floating Rotor/ 2 Piston Caliper	Single / 300 mm Floating Rotor/ 2 Piston Caliper

Suspension

Front	119 mm Cartridge Type Telescopic Fork	119 mm Cartridge Type Telescopic Fork
Rear	114 mm Single Shock with Air Adjust	114 mm Single Shock with Air Adjust

Colors Available

Colors

Thunder Black Pearl, Brilliant Blue, Bronze Smoke with Graphic , Thunder Black with Graphic

Willow Green over Ivory Cream, Indian Motorcycle Red

Physical Specs

Length	2506 mm	2630 mm
Width	1000 mm	1000 mm
Height	1388 mm	1491 mm
Weight	378 kg	405 kg
Wheelbase	1668 mm	1668 mm
Ground Clearance	142 mm	140 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	20.8 litres	20.8 litres

Overview

Features

--

--

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

4635