Hyosung Aquila Pro 650 vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Hyosung Aquila Pro 650 vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

Compare Specifications of Hyosung Aquila Pro 650 and Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

Selected Bikes

Hyosung Aquila Pro 650 Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	647.00 cc	648.00 cc
Engine	90-degree V-Twin ,water cooling ,eight-valve DOHC	Parallel twin, 4-stroke, single overhead cam, air/oil-cooled
Engine Starting	--	Electric
Fuel System	--	Fuel injection
Ignition	--	Digital spark ignition - TCI
Cooling System	--	Air/oil-cooled
Maximum Power	75 bhp @ 9000 rpm	47 PS @ 7150 RPM
Maximum Torque	62 Nm @ 7500 rpm	52 NM @ 5250 RPM
Transmission	5 Speed	6-speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern	1- N-2-3-4-5	1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Battery	--	12 volt, 8 Ah Battery
Frame	--	Tubular steel frame with bolted trussing
Headlamp	--	12V, H4-60/55W (Halogen)
Taillamp	--	12V, P21/5W Turn signal lamp 12V, 10W X 4nos

Tyres

Front	18-inch	100/90-18
Rear	17-inch	130/70-18
Wheel / RIM	Alloy	Spoke

Brakes

Front	300 mm double disc	320 mm disc (ABS)
Rear	270 mm disc	240 mm disc (ABS)

Suspension

Front	43 mm inverted fork	41 mm front fork, 110 mm travel
Rear	dual hydraulic shock	Twin coil-over shocks, 88 mm travel

Colors Available

Colors

--

--

Physical Specs

Length	--	2122 mm
Width	--	1165 mm
Height	--	789 mm
Weight	240 kg	--
Kerb Weight	--	202
Seat Height	--	804
Wheelbase	--	1400 mm
Ground Clearance	160 mm	174 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	16 litres	13.7 litres

Overview

Features	--	--
Accessories	--	Sump Guard Flyscreens Heel Guards Brace Pad Bar end

Pros and Cons

Pros	--	- Classic design with modern features. - Robust engine and high torque performance. - Comfortable seating and ergonomics. - Quality range of accessories.
Cons	--	- Might be heavy for some riders. - Limited fuel tank capacity for long-distance travel.

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

3565