Husqvarna TE 300 vs Keeway K300 N

Compare Specifications of TE 300 and K300 N

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna TE 300
Husqvarna TE 300

Brand:

Model:

Keeway K300 N
Keeway K300 N

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 293.20 cc 292.40 cc
Engine 1-cylinder 2-stroke engine, water-cooled, with reed intake and exhaust control Single Cylinder Liquid cooled, 4 Stroke Engine
Engine Starting Kick starter and Electric starter Electric
Engine Lubrication Mixture oil lubrication --
Clutch Wet multi-disc clutch DDS / Brembo hydraulics --
Ignition Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment, type Kokusan --
Cooling System Liquid cooling system Liquid cooled
Maximum Power -- 27.50 HP @8750 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 25 Nm @7000 rpm
Load Carrying Capacity -- 151 Kg
Transmission 6 gear, claw shifted 6 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain
Frame Central tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing --
Tyres
Front -- 110/70-17
Rear -- 140/60-17
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc brake with two-piston floating brake caliper Single disc, opposing four-piston calipers, 292mm
Rear Disc brake with single-piston floating brake caliper Single disc, single-piston calipers, 220mm
ABS -- Dual Channel
Suspension
Front -- USD shockabsorber, 37mm
Rear -- Center Monoshock
Colors Available
Colors White Matte Red
Matte White
Matte Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 1990 mm
Width -- 780 mm
Height -- 1070 mm
Weight 104.4 kg --
Wheelbase 1482±10 mm 1360 mm
Ground Clearance 355 mm 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11 litres --
Overview
About -- The Keeway K300 N is a stylish and powerful motorcycle with a 292.40 cc, Single Cylinder Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Powerful engine performance
- Robust suspension and chassis
- High-quality construction and design
- Dual Channel ABS system for enhanced safety
Cons -- - Slightly higher price tag
- Lack of a kick start mechanism

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1365