Husqvarna FE 350 S vs KTM 390 Adventure

Compare Specifications of FE 350 S and 390 Adventure

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna FE 350 S
Husqvarna FE 350 S

Brand:

Model:

KTM 390 Adventure
KTM 390 Adventure

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 349.70 cc 373.00 cc
Engine Single-cylinder, 4-stroke, spark-ignition engine, liquid-cooled 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric starter Electric
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps Wet sump
Clutch Wet multi-disc clutch DDS / Brembo hydraulics PASC™ antihopping clutch, mechanically operated
Ignition Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment --
Cooling System Liquid cooling system, continuous circulation of cooling liquid with water pump Liquid cooling
Maximum Power -- 42.9 Hp
Maximum Torque -- 37 Nm
Transmission 6-speed, claw shifted 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame Central tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing Steel trellis frame, powder coated
Chain -- 520 X-Ring
Tyres
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc brake with two-piston floating brake caliper 320 mm Four-piston radial fixed calliper
Rear Disc brake with single-piston floating brake caliper 230 mm Single-piston floating calliper
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors White --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 109 kg 158 kg
Seat Height -- 855
Wheelbase 1482±10 mm --
Ground Clearance 345 mm 200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 8.5 litres 14.5 litres
Overview
About -- The KTM 390 Adventure is a powerful and capable motorcycle that is designed for adventure enthu Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Potent 373 cc engine provides exhilarating performance.
- Robust braking system instills confidence in various conditions.
- PASC antihopping clutch enhances control and smoothness.
- High ground clearance and steel trellis frame make it off-road ready.
- Aggressive yet functional design appeals to adventure enthusiasts.
Cons -- - Seat height might be challenging for shorter riders.
- The aggressive power output might be overwhelming for novice riders.
- Limited fuel tank capacity could affect long-distance travel.
- The bike's weight could be a factor in less agile handling in certain off-road conditions.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8675