Husqvarna FC 350 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Compare Specifications of FC 350 and Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna FC 350
Husqvarna FC 350

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue
Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Blue

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 349.70 cc 346.00 cc
Engine Single-cylinder, 4-stroke, spark-ignition engine, liquid-cooled Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark, Aircooled
Engine Starting Electric starter --
Engine Lubrication Forced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps Wet sump
Clutch Wet multi-disc CSS-clutch, Magura hydraulics Wet, multi-plate
Ignition Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment Transistorised Coil Ignition
Cooling System Liquid cooling system, continuous circulation of cooling liquid with water pump Air Cooled
Maximum Power -- 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 5-speed, claw shifted 5 Speed Constant Mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Battery -- 12 volt, 8 Ah
Frame Central tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing --
Headlamp -- 60 W / 55 W, HALOGEN
Taillamp -- 21 W / 5 W
Mileage
City Mileage -- 37 kmpl
Tyres
Front -- 90/90 - 19
Rear -- 110/90 - 18
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front Disc brake with two-piston floating brake caliper 280 mm Disc, 2-Piston caliper
Rear Disc brake with single-piston floating brake caliper 240 mm Disc, Single piston caliper
Suspension
Front -- Telescopic, 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear -- Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors White --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2180 mm
Width -- 790 mm
Height -- 1080 mm
Weight 101.7 kg 187 kg
Wheelbase 1485±10 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance 370 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About -- Check the other color variants
Read More
Features -- --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Timeless classic design
- Comfortable riding position
- Robust build quality
- Wide service network
Cons -- - Heavier than some competitors
- Lacks modern features like a digital console
- Fuel efficiency could be improved

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4661