Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade vs Triumph Street Scrambler 2021

Compare Specifications of CBR1000RR Fireblade and Street Scrambler 2021

Selected Bikes

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade

Brand:

Model:

Triumph Street Scrambler 2021
Triumph Street Scrambler 2021

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 999.00 cc 900.00 cc
Engine Liquid- cooled 4-Stroke 16-valve DOHC inline 4 Liquid cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel twin
Engine Starting Electric --
Clutch Wet, multiplate clutch with diaphragm spring with assist slipper Wet, multi-plate torque assist clutch
Fuel System PGM-DSFI Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Ignition Computer-controlled digital transistorised with electronic advance --
Cooling System Liquid-cooled Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 189 bhp @ 13000 rpm 65 PS @ 7250 rpm
Maximum Torque 114 Nm @ 11000 rpm 80 Nm @ 3250 rpm
Transmission Constant mesh, 6-speed return 5 speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-down, 5-up 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 299 kmph --
Riding Modes -- 3 Riding Modes Rain, Road and Off-Road
Battery 12V-7AH / 12V4.5AH(Li-ion) --
Display -- Analogue speedometer with LCD multi-functional display
Frame Diamond; aluminium composite twin-spar Tubular steel, with twin cradles
Handle Bar -- Wide aluminium handlebar
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Mileage
Standard Test Conditions 17.4 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 120/70ZR17 58W 100/90-19 Metzeler Tourance
Rear 190/50ZR17 73W 150/70 R17 Metzeler Tourance
Wheel / RIM Alloy Front Wheel : Spoked steel rims, 19’’ x 2.5’’
Rear Wheel : Spoked steel rims, 17’’ x 4.25’’
Brakes
Front Dual full-floating 320 mm (13 in) discs with four-piston radial-mounted callipers Single 310 mm floating disc, Brembo 4-piston fixed axial caliper, ABS
Rear Single 220 mm (8.7 in) disc with single-piston calliper Single 255 mm disc, Nissin 2-piston floating caliper, ABS
Suspension
Front 43 mm Telescopic inverted fork with an inner tube 41 mm forks with cartridge damping. 120 mm travel
Rear Unit Pro-Lin with gascharged HMAS damper featuring 10 step preload and steeples compression Twin shocks with adjustable preload. 120 mm rear wheel travel
Colors Available
Colors Victory Red and Matt Ballistic Black Metallic Jet Black
Matt Khaki
Matt Ironstone


Physical Specs
Length 1125 mm --
Width 720 mm --
Height 1135 mm 1180 mm
Weight 196 kg 223 kg
Handlebar Width -- 790
Seat Height -- 790
Wheelbase 1405 mm 1445 mm
Ground Clearance 130 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 16 litres 12 litres
Overview
About The 2008-2009 CBR 1000RR won the Cycle World's International Bike Award.
The Best Sportb Read More
--
Features Aerodynamic bodywork incorporates neatly cover ABS system,sleek continuation of front & attractive black under seat cowl.
Fully adjustable 43mm inverted HMAS cartridge type front fork provides ideal balance.
Superb braking power & minimal unsprung weight by radially mounted four position callipers and six point floating rotors.
Light, compact and powerful engine features pared-down components & sleeveless cylinders facilities high performance and minimum weight.
Advanced gravity die-cast aluminium mono backbone frame.
Unit prolink rear suspension system was developed for Honda's MotoGP campaign.
Light weight aluminium three-spoke Wheels helps to minimise mass.
- Switchable ABS and traction control
- 3 Riding modes
- Ensuring optimum performance in wet or dry conditions
Additional Details -- Exhaust : Brushed stainless steel 2 into 2 exhaust system with twin high-level brushed stainless steel silencers
Final Drive : O ring chain
Swingarm : Twin-sided steel fabrication
Rake: 25.5 º
Trail :153 mm
Fuel Consumption : 4.3 litres / 100 km
CO2 Figures : 99 g/km "EURO 5 CO2 emissions and fuel consumption data are measured according to regulation 168/2013/EC. Figures for fuel consumption are derived from specific test conditions and are for comparative purposes only. They may not reflect real driving results."
Pros and Cons
Pros Great performer
Superb suspension
Awesome handling
--
Cons Not a great show-stopper as its rivals --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6854