Honda CB500F vs Suzuki RM-Z450

Compare Specifications of Honda CB500F and RM-Z450

Selected Bikes

Honda CB500F
Honda CB500F

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki RM-Z450
Suzuki RM-Z450

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Engince Displacement 471.00 cc 449.00 cc
Engine Type Liquid-cooled, fuel-injected, DOHC, 180 crank, parallel-twin motor. 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, single cylinder, DOHC
Engine Starting Electric Push Start Electric
Ignition Computer controlled digital transistorized with electronic advance Electronic ignition (CDI)
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 46.93 bhp @ 8500 rpm --
Maximum Torque 43 Nm @ 7000 rpm --
Transmission 6-Speed Manual 5-speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1- N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed -- --
Battery 12V 8.6Ah --
Frame Steel Diamond Type Frame The aluminum alloy twin-spar
Ground Clearance -- 320 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16.7 litres 6.3 litres
Mileage
Tyres
Front 120/70R 17 80/100-21 M/C 51M, tube type
Rear 160/60R 17 110/90-18 M/C 64M, tube type
Wheelbase 1410 mm 1485 mm
Brakes
Front Twin-piston caliper with single 320mm wave disc Disc brake, single rotor
Rear Single-caliper 240mm wave disc Disc brake, single rotor
Suspension
Front 41 mm fork , 4.8 inches travel Inverted Telescopic, air spring, oil damped
Rear Pro-Link single shock with nine-position spring preload adjustability; 4.1 inches travel Link type, coil spring, oil damped
Colors Available
Colors Millennium Red, Lemon Ice Yellow, Candy Energy Orange and Matt Gunpowder Black Metallic Championship Yellow with black/blue accents


Physical Specs
Width -- 840 mm
Height -- 1,265 mm
Length -- 2,185 mm
Weight 191 kg 123.5 kg

Overview
About Honda launched CB 500F globally in the November 2012. This model was based on the Honda CB 500 Read More --
Special Features Aggressive styling. - HEIST THE HOLESHOT
- REVISED S-HAC
- MAXIMUM TRACTION
- NEXT GENERATION CHASSIS
- 49MM SHOWA SPRING FORK
- FACTORY STYLING
- RENTHAL ALUMINIUM FATBAR
- RICH & LEAN FUEL COUPLERS



Pros and Cons
Pros Cost effective.
Less maintenance cost.
--
Cons -- --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name:

Comment:

6273 Enter the numbers here: