Hero Xtreme 160R 100 Million Edition vs Yamaha Hyper Slaz 150

Compare Specifications of Xtreme 160R 100 Million Edition and Hyper Slaz 150

Selected Bikes

Hero Xtreme 160R 100 Million Edition
Hero Xtreme 160R 100 Million Edition

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Hyper Slaz 150
Yamaha Hyper Slaz 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 163.00 cc 150.00 cc
Engine Air cooled, 4 Stroke 2 Valve Single cylinder OHC Single cylinder engine
Engine Starting Self & Kick --
Clutch Multi Plate Wet Clutch --
Fuel System Advanced Programmed Fuel Injection --
Cooling System Air cooled --
Maximum Power 15 bhp @ 8500 rpm 16.09 BHP
Maximum Torque 14 Nm @ 6500 rpm 14.3 Nm
Transmission 5 speed Constant Mesh --
Top Speed -- 130 kmph
Display Speedometer : Inverted LCD Console --
Frame Tubular Diamond Deltabox frame
Headlamp Full LED with LED DRLs --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 (Tubeless) Pirelli Diablo Rosso II tyres
Rear 130/70 -R17 Radial (Tubeless) Pirelli Diablo Rosso II tyres
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 276 mm Petal Disc, Single Channel ABS --
Rear 220 mm Petal Disc | 130 mm Drum --
Suspension
Front 37 mm Telescopic with anti friction bush USD Forks
Rear 7 step Rider-adjustable Monoshock Ohlins fully adjustable unit
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2029 mm --
Width 793 mm --
Height 1052 mm --
Weight -- 135 kg
Kerb Weight 138.5 --
Seat Height 790 --
Wheelbase 1327 mm --
Ground Clearance 167 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres --
Overview
Features - Side Stand Engine Cut-Off
- Auto Sail Technology
- Hazard Lights
--
Additional Details Kerb Weight : 139.5 kg (Double Disc) --
Pros and Cons
Pros - Striking and aggressive design
- Comfortable and rider-friendly ergonomics
- Powerful and efficient engine
- Advanced features like side stand engine cut-off and hazard lights
- Reliable build quality and durability
--
Cons - Lack of dual-channel ABS option
- Limited color options in the 100 Million Edition variant
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1017