Harley Davidson 2023 Pan America 1250 vs Triumph Scrambler 1200 Steve McQueen

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Harley Davidson 2023 Pan America 1250 vs Triumph Scrambler 1200 Steve McQueen

Compare Specifications of 2023 Pan America 1250 and Scrambler 1200 Steve McQueen

Selected Bikes

Harley Davidson 2023 Pan America 1250 Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Triumph Scrambler 1200 Steve McQueen Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	1252.00 cc	1200.00 cc
Engine	Revolution Max 1250	Liquid cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel twin
Clutch	--	Wet, multi-plate assist clutch
Fuel System	Electronic Sequential Port Fuel Injection (ESPFI)	Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Cooling System	--	Liquid cooled
Maximum Power	150 Ps @ 8750 rpm	89 Bhp @ 7250 rpm
Maximum Torque	128 Nm @ 6750 rpm	110 Nm @ 4500 rpm
Transmission	--	6-speed
Top Speed	217 kmph	--
Display	6.8 inch viewable area TFT display	--
Frame	--	Tubular steel with aluminium cradles
Headlamp	Daymaker Signature LED headlamp, low and high beam with signature position lighting	--
Taillamp	LED Tail/Stop lamp with signature tail lighting	--

Mileage

Overall Mileage

18 kmpl

--

Tyres

Front	120/70R19 60V Michelin Scorcher“Adventure”, Radial	90/90-21
Rear	170/60R17 72V Michelin Scorcher “Adventure”, Radial	150/70 R17
Wheel / RIM	Aluminum cast, satin black	Front Wheel : Tubeless 36-spoke 21 x 2.15 in, aluminium rims Rear Wheel : Tubeless 32-spoke 17 x 4.25 in, aluminium rims

Brakes

Front	Radially mounted, monoblock, 4-piston caliper	Twin 320 mm discs, Brembo M50 monoblock calipers, radial master cylinder. Switchable Optimised Cornering ABS
Rear	Floating, single piston caliper	Single 255 mm disc, Brembo 2-piston floating caliper. Switchable Optimised Cornering ABS

Suspension

Front	47mm inverted fork with compression, rebound and spring preload adjustability. Aluminum fork triple clamps.	Showa 47 mm fully adjustable USD forks. 250 mm wheel travel.
Rear	Linkage-mounted monoshock with automatic electronic preload control and semi-active compression & rebound damping	Öhlins fully adjustable piggy-back RSUs with twin springs. 250 mm wheel travel.

Colors Available

Colors

Vivid Black

COMPETITION GREEN

Physical Specs

Length	2270 mm	--
Height	--	1250 mm
Weight	229 kg	207 kg
Handlebar Width	--	905
Seat Height	850	870
Wheelbase	1585 mm	1570 mm
Ground Clearance	210 mm	--
Fuel Tank Capacity	21.2 litres	16 litres

Overview

Features	- Hands free mobile phone - via Bluetooth - Voice recognition - Text to speech - Rider/Passenger Intercom (Headset function only) - Vehicle information screen (Air pressure, Oil pressure & EITMS) - USB Charging and Instrument update, USB-C, 5V, 3A SAFETY - Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) - Electronic Linked Braking (ELB) - Hill Hold Control (HHC) - Traction Control System (TCS) - Drag-Torque Slip Control System (DSCS) - Wheel Lift Mitigation - Cornering Enhanced Anti-Lock Brake System (C-ABS) - Cornering Enhanced Electronic Linked Braking (C-ELB) - Cornering Enhanced Traction Control System (C-TCS) - Cornering Drag-Torque Slip Control System (C-DSCS) - Enhanced Lift Mitigation	--
Additional Details	- Rake : 25 - Trail : 108 mm - Oil Capacity (W/FILTER) : 4.5 L - Exhaust : 2-into-1-into-1; catalyst in header - Lean Angle, Right & Left (Degree) : 42 Degree - CO2 Emission : 129 g/km CO2 - Primary Drive : Gear, 49/89 ratio	Exhaust : Brushed 2 into 2 exhaust system with Arrow brushed high level silencer Final Drive : X ring chain Swingarm : Twin-sided, aluminium, 579 mm long Rake : 26.9 º Trail : 129.2 mm Fuel Consumption : 4.6 l/100 km CO2 Figures : 105 g/km EURO 5 CO2 emissions and fuel consumption data are measured according to regulation 168/2013/EC. Figures for fuel consumption are derived from specific test conditions and are for comparative purposes only. They may not reflect real driving results.

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

478