Eider Dronzer vs Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Compare Specifications of Dronzer and Gixxer SF SP

Selected Bikes

Eider Dronzer
Eider Dronzer

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Gixxer SF SP
Suzuki Gixxer SF SP

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 150.06 cc 154.90 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke 4-Stroke. 1-Cylinder, Air-cooled, SOHC, 2 Valve
Engine Starting Electric / Kick Electric & Kick
Fuel System Carburetor Carburetor
Ignition C.D.I --
Cooling System Air --
Maximum Power 11.5 Ps (8.5kw) @ 8000rpm 14.8ps@8000 rpm
Maximum Torque 10.5 N.m @ 7500 rpm 14Nm@6000rpm
Transmission 5-Speed --
Top Speed 110 kmph --
Battery 12V 5AH Maintenance free 12V, 3Ah
Frame Steel --
Headlamp LED Digital 12 V 35/35 W
Taillamp LED LED
Mileage
Standard Test Conditions 60 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 80/90 - 17 100/80-17 - Tubeless
Rear 110/80 - 17 140/60R - 17 - Radial Tubeless
Brakes
Front Disc Brake Disc
Rear Disc Brake Disc
Suspension
Front Telescopic Upside down front Suspension Telescopic
Rear Mono Suspension Swing Arm, Mono Suspension
Colors Available
Colors Blue, Red, Yellow Matte Fibron Grey, Glass Sparkle Black


Physical Specs
Length 1980 mm 2050 mm
Width 700 mm 785 mm
Height 1080 mm 1085 mm
Weight -- 139 kg
Wheelbase 1340 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance 160 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 12 litres
Overview
About -- Gixxer SF SP is the limited edition version of the Gixxer SF. This all new motorcycle is loaded Read More
Features A newly introduced Telescopic Upside down suspension at front end with disc brakes.
Trendy looking LCD digital headlight.
A stylish digital and analog Speedometer with fuel capacity indicator.
A sleeky designed 15 liters fuel tank.
Optimized single cylinder 4-stroke engine with a 5-Speed Gearbox with an efficient mileage of 60 kmpl.
Mono suspension with disc brakes at the rare end.
Stylish SP Emblem & Sporty Graphics
Clear Lens LED Tail Lamp
Alluminium Muffler Cover
Smart Digital Instrumentation
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Excellent power and torque figures
- Comfortable for long rides
- Stylish design and attractive graphics
- Efficient fuel economy
- High-quality build and durability
Cons -- - Might be a bit pricey for some buyers
- Carburetor fuel system may require regular cleaning and maintenance
- Lack of a liquid-cooled engine could be a potential downside for some riders

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8332