Ducati Scrambler Urban Motard vs Triumph Bonneville Street Twin EC1 Special Edition

Compare Specifications of Scrambler Urban Motard and Bonneville Street Twin EC1 Special Edition

Selected Bikes

Ducati Scrambler Urban Motard
Ducati Scrambler Urban Motard

Brand:

Model:

Triumph Bonneville Street Twin EC1 Special Edition
Triumph Bonneville Street Twin EC1 Special Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 803.00 cc 900.00 cc
Engine L-Twin, Desmodromic distribution, 2 valves per cylinder, air cooled Liquid cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel twin
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Clutch Hydraulically controlled slipper and self-servo wet multiplate clutch Wet, multi-plate torque assist clutch
Fuel System Electronic fuel injection, 50 mm throttle body Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Cooling System Air cooled Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 73 PS @ 8250 RPM 65 PS / 64.1 bhp (47.8 kW) @ 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque 66.2 NM @ 5750 RPM 80 Nm @ 3800 RPM
Seating Capacity Dual seat --
Transmission 6 speed 5 speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4--5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain Primary drive: Straight cut gears, Ratio 1,85:1
Ratio: 1= 32/13 2= 30/18 3= 28/21 4= 26/23 5= 22/22 6= 24/26
Final drive: Chain, front sprocket 15, rear sprocket 46
Final Drive: Chain
Display LCD Analogue speedometer with LCD multi-functional display
Frame Tubular steel Trellis frame Tubular steel, twin cradle frame
Handle Bar Low variable section aluminum handlebar --
Seats Custom flat seat --
Headlamp Headlight with DRL by LED light-guide and interchangeable aluminium cover --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front Pirelli Diablo Rosso III - 120/70-ZR17 100/90-18
Rear Pirelli Diablo Rosso III - 180/55-ZR17 150/70 R17
Wheel / RIM Front wheel : Spoked aluminium wheel 3.5’’ x 17’’
Rear Wheel : Spoked aluminium wheel 5,50" x 17"
Front Wheel: Cast aluminium alloy multi-spoke, 18 x 2.75 inches
Rear Wheel: Cast aluminium alloy multi-spoke, 17 x 4.25 inches
Brakes
Front 330 mm disc, radial 4-piston calliper with Bosch Cornering ABS as standard equipment Single 310mm floating disc, Brembo 4 piston fixed axial caliper, ABS
Rear 245 mm disc, 1-piston floating calliper with Bosch Cornering ABS as standard equipment Single 255mm disc, Nissin 2 piston floating caliper, ABS
Suspension
Front Upside down Kayaba 41 mm fork 41mm cartridge forks
Rear Kayaba rear shock, pre-load adjustable Twin RSUs with preload adjustment
Colors Available
Colors Star White Silk and Ducati GP ’19 Red colours MATT SILVER ICE / MATT ALUMINIUM SILVER


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Width -- 780 mm
Height -- 1110 mm
Weight 180 kg 216 kg
Kerb Weight 196 --
Seat Height 805 765
Wheelbase 1436 mm 1450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.5 litres 12 litres
Overview
Features - Graffiti style
- Spoked wheels
- Steel tank with interchangeable aluminium side panels
- LED rear light with diffusions-light, LED turn indicator
- LCD instruments with gear and fuel level indications and interchangeable aluminium cover
- Under-seat storage compartment with USB socket
- ABS cornering
- Machine-finished aluminium belt covers
- Black engine with brushed fins
- High front mudguard
- Pirelli Diablo Rosso III tires
- Side number plates
- Custom graphics on tank and side panels
Exhaust: Brushed stainless steel 2 into 2 exhaust system with twin silencers
Additional Details Exhaust: Stainless steel muffler with catalytic converter and 2 lambda probes, aluminium tail pipes
Wheel travel (front/rear):150 mm / 150 mm (5,9 in / 5,9 in)
Rake: 24°
Trail: 94 mm (3,7 in)
Maintenance service intervals: 12,000 km (7,500 mi) / 12 months
Desmoservice: 12,000 km (7,500 mi)
Standard: Euro 5
CO2 Emissions: 120 g/km
Consumption: 5,2 l/100 km
Emission Notes:Only for countries where Euro 5 standard applies
Swingarm: Twin sided fabrication
Rake: 25.1 º
Trail : 102.4 mm
Fuel Consumption : 68.9 mpg (4.1 l/100km)
CO2 Figures: 93g/km EURO 5 CO2 emissions and fuel consumption data are measured according to regulation 168/2013/EC. Figures for fuel consumption are derived from specific test conditions and are for comparative purposes only. They may not reflect real driving results.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2998