Ducati Monster 1200 vs Triumph Scrambler 1200 Steve McQueen

Compare Specifications of Monster 1200 and Scrambler 1200 Steve McQueen

Selected Bikes

Ducati Monster 1200
Ducati Monster 1200

Brand:

Model:

Triumph Scrambler 1200 Steve McQueen
Triumph Scrambler 1200 Steve McQueen

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1198.00 cc 1200.00 cc
Engine Testastretta 11° DS engine Liquid cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel twin
Engine Starting Electric --
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate assist clutch
Fuel System -- Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Cooling System -- Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 135 hp 89 Bhp @ 7250 rpm
Maximum Torque 87 lbs. ft.. 110 Nm @ 4500 rpm
Transmission 6 speed 6-speed
Top Speed 200+ kmph --
Frame -- Tubular steel with aluminium cradles
Tyres
Front -- 90/90-21
Rear -- 150/70 R17
Wheel / RIM -- Front Wheel : Tubeless 36-spoke 21 x 2.15 in, aluminium rims
Rear Wheel : Tubeless 32-spoke 17 x 4.25 in, aluminium rims
Brakes
Front -- Twin 320 mm discs, Brembo M50 monoblock calipers, radial master cylinder. Switchable Optimised Cornering ABS
Rear -- Single 255 mm disc, Brembo 2-piston floating caliper. Switchable Optimised Cornering ABS
Suspension
Front -- Showa 47 mm fully adjustable USD forks. 250 mm wheel travel.
Rear -- Öhlins fully adjustable piggy-back RSUs with twin springs. 250 mm wheel travel.
Colors Available
Colors -- COMPETITION GREEN


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Height -- 1250 mm
Weight -- 207 kg
Handlebar Width -- 905
Seat Height -- 870
Wheelbase -- 1570 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 16 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Exhaust : Brushed 2 into 2 exhaust system with Arrow brushed high level silencer
Final Drive : X ring chain
Swingarm : Twin-sided, aluminium, 579 mm long
Rake : 26.9 º
Trail : 129.2 mm
Fuel Consumption : 4.6 l/100 km
CO2 Figures : 105 g/km EURO 5 CO2 emissions and fuel consumption data are measured according to regulation 168/2013/EC. Figures for fuel consumption are derived from specific test conditions and are for comparative purposes only. They may not reflect real driving results.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1896