CFMoto 650GT vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

Compare Specifications of 650GT and Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

Selected Bikes

CFMoto 650GT
CFMoto 650GT

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 120th Year Anniversary Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 649.30 cc 648.00 cc
Engine 2-cylinder inline, 4-stroke, Liquid cooled Parallel twin, 4-stroke, single overhead cam, air/oil-cooled
Engine Starting -- Electric
Fuel System EFI Fuel injection
Ignition ECU Digital spark ignition - TCI
Cooling System Liquid cooled Air/oil-cooled
Maximum Power 62.54 PS @ 9000 rpm 47 PS @ 7150 RPM
Maximum Torque 54.4 Nm at 7000 RPM 52 NM @ 5250 RPM
Transmission 6-speed 6-speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 170 kmph --
Battery -- 12 volt, 8 Ah Battery
Display 5 inch colorful TFT display --
Frame -- Tubular steel frame with bolted trussing
Headlamp -- 12V, H4-60/55W (Halogen)
Taillamp -- 12V, P21/5W
Turn signal lamp 12V, 10W X 4nos
Mileage
Overall Mileage 20 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 120/70 ZR17 100/90-18
Rear 160/60 ZR17 130/70-18
Wheel / RIM Alloy
Rim : Front : MT 3.5x17; Rear : MT 4.5x17
Spoke
Brakes
Front Hydraulic 320 mm disc (ABS)
Rear Hydraulic 240 mm disc (ABS)
ABS Continental dual channel ABS system --
Suspension
Front retractable type 41 mm front fork, 110 mm travel
Rear cantilever type Twin coil-over shocks, 88 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Concept blue/Nebula Black --


Physical Specs
Length 2100 mm 2122 mm
Width 930 mm 1165 mm
Height 1340 mm 789 mm
Weight 226 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 202
Seat Height -- 804
Wheelbase 1415 mm 1400 mm
Ground Clearance 150 mm 174 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 19 litres 13.7 litres
Overview
Features Cfmoto 650gt --
Accessories -- Sump Guard
Flyscreens
Heel Guards
Brace Pad
Bar end
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Classic design with modern features.
- Robust engine and high torque performance.
- Comfortable seating and ergonomics.
- Quality range of accessories.
Cons -- - Might be heavy for some riders.
- Limited fuel tank capacity for long-distance travel.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1018