CFMoto 300NK vs Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Compare Specifications of 300NK and Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Selected Bikes

CFMoto 300NK
CFMoto 300NK

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue
Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 292.40 cc 346.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder,4-stroke,Liquid cooled,4-value,DOHC,Balance shaft Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air cooled,
Engine Starting -- Kick
Fuel System EFI Constant Vacuum Carburettor
Ignition ECU --
Cooling System Liquid cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 27.49 PS @ 8750 rpm 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 25 Nm @ 7000 rpm 28Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission 6-speed 5 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 130 kmph --
Display All Color TFT Display --
Frame -- Single down tube
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Mileage
Overall Mileage 30 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 110/70 R17 90 / 90 - 19
Rear 140/60 R17 110 / 80 - 18
Wheel / RIM Rim : Front - MT 3.5x17, Rear - MT 4.0x17 Spoke
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc 280 mm ventilated disc, double piston caliper
Rear Hydraulic disc 240 mm ventilated disc, single piston caliper
ABS Dual Channel ABS --
Suspension
Front retractable type 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear cantilever type Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Blue
Grey
Airborne Blue


Physical Specs
Length 1990 mm 2160 mm
Width 780 mm 790 mm
Height 1070 mm 1090 mm
Weight 151 kg 192 kg
Wheelbase 1360 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance 150 mm 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12.5 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About The CFMoto 300NK is a noteworthy addition to the entry-level sportbike segment. It boasts a Read More Check the other variant
Read More
Features - Lightweight Display
- All Color TFT Display

Cfmoto 300nk
Split Seats

Cfmoto 300nk
LED Headlamp

Cfmoto 300nk
Engine

Cfmoto 300nk
Rear Wheel
--
Additional Details MINIMUM TURNING DIAMETER : 4.7m --
Pros and Cons
Pros -- - Vibrant and unique aesthetic design
- Robust engine with good performance
- Comfortable ride quality with efficient suspension system
- Efficient braking system for enhanced safety
Cons -- - Some riders might find the bike a bit heavy at 192 kg
- Fuel efficiency could be improved for city commute

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6434