BMW G 310 RR vs Royal Enfield Thunderbird 350

Compare Specifications of BMW G 310 RR and Thunderbird 350

Selected Bikes

BMW G 310 RR
BMW G 310 RR

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Thunderbird 350
Royal Enfield Thunderbird 350

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 312.12 cc 346.00 cc
Engine Single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts and cam followers Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark, Air cooled
Engine Starting -- Electric Push Start and Kick Start
Engine Lubrication Wet sump lubrication --
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate
Fuel System Electronic fuel injection Carburettor
Ignition -- Transistorized Coil Ignition
Cooling System Water-cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 34 Ps @ 9700 Rpm - In Track/Sport mode
25.8 Ps @ 7700 Rpm - Rain/Urban mode
19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 27.3 Nm @ 7700 Rpm - In Track/Sport mode
25 Nm @ 6700 Rpm - In Rain/Urban mode
28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Load Carrying Capacity Permitted total weight : 304 kg
Payload (with standard equipment) : 130 kg
--
Transmission Constant mesh 6-speed gearbox integrated in crankcase 5-Speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain Endless X-ring chain with shock damping in rear wheel hub --
Top Speed 160 kmph 130 kmph
Speed 160 km/h in Track/Sport mode
125 km/h in Rain/Urban mode
--
Battery 12 V / 8 Ah, maintenance-free 12 volt, 8Ah
Frame Tubular space frame Single Downtube Frame
Headlamp LED Projection type headlamp
Taillamp -- LED lamp with position light guides
Mileage
Highway Mileage -- 45 kmpl
City Mileage -- 38 kmpl
Overall Mileage 30 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 110/70 R 17 90/90 - 19
Rear 150/60 R 17 120/80 - 18
Wheel / RIM Cast aluminium wheels
Front : 3.00 x 17"
Rear : 4.00 x 17"
Spoke
Brakes
Front Single disc, diameter 300 mm, 4-piston fixed caliper, radially bolted 280 mm Disc, 2-Piston Caliper
Rear Single disc, diameter 240 mm, single-piston floating caliper 240 mm Disc, Single Piston Caliper
ABS BMW Motorrad ABS --
Suspension
Front Upside down fork, 41 mm 41 mm Telescopic Forks with 130 mm travel
Rear Cast aluminium dual swing arm, central spring strut Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload having 80 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Cosmic black 2
Black storm metallic
Sport
Stone, Marine, Lightning, Flicker and Asphalt


Physical Specs
Length 2001 mm 2060 mm
Width 767 mm 790 mm
Height 1135 mm 1205 mm
Weight 174 kg 195 kg
Seat Height 811 --
Wheelbase 1365 mm 1350 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11 litres 20 litres
Overview
About The BMW G 310 RR is a sporty bike that packs a punch with its 312.12 cc single-cylinder Read More Thunderbird is the only cruiser type motorcycle from the RoyalEnfield family launched in 2000. Read More
Features - BMW Motorrad ABS
- Electromotive throttle controller made of stainless steel

Bmw G 310 Rr

Bmw G 310 Rr
Rear Light
--
Additional Details Emission control : Closed-loop 3-way catalytic converter, emission standard EU-5
Fuel consumption per 100 km based on WMTC : 3.3 l
CO2 emission based on WMTC : 78 g/km
Fuel type : Unleaded regular, minimum octane number 91 (RON)
Alternator : Three-phase alternator 308 W
4 Fahrmodi : Sport / Track 25 kW / 27.3 Nm, (Rain / Urban 19 kW / 25 Nm)
Inner leg curve : 1830 mm
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Power-packed performance with its 312.12 cc single-cylinder 4-stroke engine.
- Versatility with two power modes: Track/Sport and Rain/Urban.
- Comfortable riding position and ergonomics, catering to both city and highway riding.
- Exceptional durability backed by BMW's reputation for reliability.
- Advanced safety features including BMW Motorrad ABS and robust braking system.
- Unique design elements including LED headlamp and distinct 'RR' branding.
- Significant load-carrying capacity, making it suitable for long road trips.
- Robust engine performance
- Classic design with modern features
- Comfortable ride quality
- Impressive fuel efficiency
- Excellent durability and safety features
Cons - The high price tag might be a deterrent for some potential buyers.
- Fuel consumption of 3.3l per 100 km, which might not be as efficient as some competitors in the market.
- Limited color options may not appeal to all buyers.
- Might be heavy for some riders
- Fuel system could have been fuel-injected
- Spoke wheels may require more maintenance compared to alloy wheels

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6773