BMW G 310 RR vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Green

Compare Specifications of BMW G 310 RR and Classic 350 Redditch Green

Selected Bikes

BMW G 310 RR
BMW G 310 RR

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Green
Royal Enfield Classic 350 Redditch Green

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 312.12 cc 346.00 cc
Engine Single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts and cam followers Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark, Aircooled
Engine Starting -- Electric or Kick
Engine Lubrication Wet sump lubrication Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate
Fuel System Electronic fuel injection --
Ignition -- Transistorised Coil Ignition
Cooling System Water-cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 34 Ps @ 9700 Rpm - In Track/Sport mode
25.8 Ps @ 7700 Rpm - Rain/Urban mode
19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 27.3 Nm @ 7700 Rpm - In Track/Sport mode
25 Nm @ 6700 Rpm - In Rain/Urban mode
28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Load Carrying Capacity Permitted total weight : 304 kg
Payload (with standard equipment) : 130 kg
--
Transmission Constant mesh 6-speed gearbox integrated in crankcase 5 Speed Constant Mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain Endless X-ring chain with shock damping in rear wheel hub --
Top Speed 160 kmph --
Speed 160 km/h in Track/Sport mode
125 km/h in Rain/Urban mode
--
Battery 12 V / 8 Ah, maintenance-free 12 volt, 8 Ah
Frame Tubular space frame --
Headlamp LED 60 W / 55 W, HALOGEN
Taillamp -- 21 W / 5 W
Mileage
City Mileage -- 37 kmpl
Overall Mileage 30 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 110/70 R 17 90/90 - 19
Rear 150/60 R 17 110/90 - 18
Wheel / RIM Cast aluminium wheels
Front : 3.00 x 17"
Rear : 4.00 x 17"
Spoke
Brakes
Front Single disc, diameter 300 mm, 4-piston fixed caliper, radially bolted 280 mm Disc, 2-Piston caliper
Rear Single disc, diameter 240 mm, single-piston floating caliper 240 mm Disc, Single piston caliper
ABS BMW Motorrad ABS --
Suspension
Front Upside down fork, 41 mm Telescopic, 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear Cast aluminium dual swing arm, central spring strut Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Cosmic black 2
Black storm metallic
Sport
--


Physical Specs
Length 2001 mm 2180 mm
Width 767 mm 790 mm
Height 1135 mm 1080 mm
Weight 174 kg 187 kg
Seat Height 811 --
Wheelbase 1365 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About The BMW G 310 RR is a sporty bike that packs a punch with its 312.12 cc single-cylinder Read More Check the other color variants
Read More
Features - BMW Motorrad ABS
- Electromotive throttle controller made of stainless steel

Bmw G 310 Rr

Bmw G 310 Rr
Rear Light
--
Additional Details Emission control : Closed-loop 3-way catalytic converter, emission standard EU-5
Fuel consumption per 100 km based on WMTC : 3.3 l
CO2 emission based on WMTC : 78 g/km
Fuel type : Unleaded regular, minimum octane number 91 (RON)
Alternator : Three-phase alternator 308 W
4 Fahrmodi : Sport / Track 25 kW / 27.3 Nm, (Rain / Urban 19 kW / 25 Nm)
Inner leg curve : 1830 mm
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Power-packed performance with its 312.12 cc single-cylinder 4-stroke engine.
- Versatility with two power modes: Track/Sport and Rain/Urban.
- Comfortable riding position and ergonomics, catering to both city and highway riding.
- Exceptional durability backed by BMW's reputation for reliability.
- Advanced safety features including BMW Motorrad ABS and robust braking system.
- Unique design elements including LED headlamp and distinct 'RR' branding.
- Significant load-carrying capacity, making it suitable for long road trips.
- Timeless, elegant design.
- Robust and durable build.
- Comfortable ride with superior suspension.
- Impressive city mileage.
- Suitable for riders of all skill levels.
Cons - The high price tag might be a deterrent for some potential buyers.
- Fuel consumption of 3.3l per 100 km, which might not be as efficient as some competitors in the market.
- Limited color options may not appeal to all buyers.
- Weight may be a concern for some riders.
- Classic design may not appeal to riders preferring modern aesthetics.
- Absence of liquid cooling system.

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6069