BMW G 310 RR vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 BS VI

Compare Specifications of BMW G 310 RR and Classic 350 BS VI

Selected Bikes

BMW G 310 RR
BMW G 310 RR

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic 350 BS VI
Royal Enfield Classic 350 BS VI

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 312.12 cc 346.00 cc
Engine Single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts and cam followers Single cylinder 4 stroke, air-cooled fuel injection
Engine Starting -- Electric/kick
Engine Lubrication Wet sump lubrication Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet multiplate (6 plates)
Fuel System Electronic fuel injection Electronic Fuel Injection
Ignition -- Electronic ignition ECU/Variable
Cooling System Water-cooled Air Cooling
Maximum Power 34 Ps @ 9700 Rpm - In Track/Sport mode
25.8 Ps @ 7700 Rpm - Rain/Urban mode
19.1 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 27.3 Nm @ 7700 Rpm - In Track/Sport mode
25 Nm @ 6700 Rpm - In Rain/Urban mode
28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Load Carrying Capacity Permitted total weight : 304 kg
Payload (with standard equipment) : 130 kg
--
Transmission Constant mesh 6-speed gearbox integrated in crankcase 5 Speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain Endless X-ring chain with shock damping in rear wheel hub --
Top Speed 160 kmph --
Speed 160 km/h in Track/Sport mode
125 km/h in Rain/Urban mode
--
Battery 12 V / 8 Ah, maintenance-free 12V - 12 Ah MF
Frame Tubular space frame Single downtube, using engine as stressed member
Headlamp LED 12V, H4-60/55W (Halogen)
Taillamp -- 12V, P21/5W
Mileage
Overall Mileage 30 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 110/70 R 17 90/90 - 19" - 52P (tubeless)
Rear 150/60 R 17 120/80 - 18" - 62P (tubeless)
Wheel / RIM Cast aluminium wheels
Front : 3.00 x 17"
Rear : 4.00 x 17"
--
Brakes
Front Single disc, diameter 300 mm, 4-piston fixed caliper, radially bolted 280 mm disc with double piston caliper
Rear Single disc, diameter 240 mm, single-piston floating caliper 240 mm disc with single piston caliper
ABS BMW Motorrad ABS --
Suspension
Front Upside down fork, 41 mm Telescopic, 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear Cast aluminium dual swing arm, central spring strut Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable
preload, 80 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Cosmic black 2
Black storm metallic
Sport
Stealth Black
Chrome Black
Gunmetal Grey
Classic Black
Stormrider sand
Airborne blue


Physical Specs
Length 2001 mm 2160 mm
Width 767 mm 790 mm
Height 1135 mm 1090 mm
Weight 174 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 195
Seat Height 811 --
Wheelbase 1365 mm 1390 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About The BMW G 310 RR is a sporty bike that packs a punch with its 312.12 cc single-cylinder Read More The Royal Enfield Classic 350 BS VI is a timeless machine that exudes vintage charm and deliver Read More
Features - BMW Motorrad ABS
- Electromotive throttle controller made of stainless steel

Bmw G 310 Rr

Bmw G 310 Rr
Rear Light
--
Additional Details Emission control : Closed-loop 3-way catalytic converter, emission standard EU-5
Fuel consumption per 100 km based on WMTC : 3.3 l
CO2 emission based on WMTC : 78 g/km
Fuel type : Unleaded regular, minimum octane number 91 (RON)
Alternator : Three-phase alternator 308 W
4 Fahrmodi : Sport / Track 25 kW / 27.3 Nm, (Rain / Urban 19 kW / 25 Nm)
Inner leg curve : 1830 mm
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Power-packed performance with its 312.12 cc single-cylinder 4-stroke engine.
- Versatility with two power modes: Track/Sport and Rain/Urban.
- Comfortable riding position and ergonomics, catering to both city and highway riding.
- Exceptional durability backed by BMW's reputation for reliability.
- Advanced safety features including BMW Motorrad ABS and robust braking system.
- Unique design elements including LED headlamp and distinct 'RR' branding.
- Significant load-carrying capacity, making it suitable for long road trips.
- Iconic and classic design
- Comfortable riding experience
- Reliable performance and excellent handling
- Variety of colour options
- Quality build and durability
Cons - The high price tag might be a deterrent for some potential buyers.
- Fuel consumption of 3.3l per 100 km, which might not be as efficient as some competitors in the market.
- Limited color options may not appeal to all buyers.
- Lacks some modern features
- Might be heavy for some riders
- Not the most powerful in its segment

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8823