BMW G 310 GS BS6 vs Royal Enfield Classic 350 BS VI

Compare Specifications of BMW G 310 GS BS6 and Classic 350 BS VI

Selected Bikes

BMW G 310 GS BS6
BMW G 310 GS BS6

Brand:

Model:

Royal Enfield Classic 350 BS VI
Royal Enfield Classic 350 BS VI

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 313.00 cc 346.00 cc
Engine Water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts and finger followers, wet sump lubrication Single cylinder 4 stroke, air-cooled fuel injection
Engine Starting Electric Start Electric/kick
Engine Lubrication Wet Sump Lubrication Wet sump
Clutch Multiplate clutch in oil bath Wet multiplate (6 plates)
Fuel System Electronic fuel injection Electronic Fuel Injection
Ignition -- Electronic ignition ECU/Variable
Cooling System Water-Cooled Air Cooling
Maximum Power 33.52 PS @ 9250 19.1 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque 28 Nm @ 7500 rpm 28 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission Constant mesh 6-speed gearbox integrated in crankcase 5 Speed constant mesh
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 143 kmph --
Battery 12 V / 8 Ah, maintenance-free 12V - 12 Ah MF
Frame Tubular space frame Single downtube, using engine as stressed member
Seats One-piece seat bench --
Headlamp LED headlights with daytime running light as standard 12V, H4-60/55W (Halogen)
Taillamp LED brake lights and flashing turn indicators 12V, P21/5W
Mileage
Overall Mileage 30.3 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 110/80 R 19’’ Tyre 90/90 - 19" - 52P (tubeless)
Rear 150/70 R 17’’ Tyre 120/80 - 18" - 62P (tubeless)
Wheel / RIM Cast aluminium wheels --
Brakes
Front Single disc, diameter 300 mm, 4-piston fixed caliper, radially bolted 280 mm disc with double piston caliper
Rear Single disc, diameter 240 mm, single-piston floating caliper 240 mm disc with single piston caliper
ABS BMW Motorrad ABS --
Suspension
Front 41 mm Upside down fork with 180 mm Travel Telescopic, 35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear Cast aluminium dual swing arm, central spring strut, spring pre-load adjustable with 180 mm Travel Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable
preload, 80 mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Rally (Paintwork in Racing red)
Sport (Polar White/Racing blue metallic combination)
Rally (Kalamata dark gold metallic paintwork)
Polar White
Cosmic Black
Kyanite Blue
Stealth Black
Chrome Black
Gunmetal Grey
Classic Black
Stormrider sand
Airborne blue


Physical Specs
Length 2075 mm 2160 mm
Width 880 mm 790 mm
Height 1230 mm 1090 mm
Kerb Weight 169.5 195
Seat Height 835 --
Wheelbase 1420 mm 1390 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
About The BMW G 310 GS BS6 is a motorcycle that has a lot to offer. The bike is powered by a water-co Read More The Royal Enfield Classic 350 BS VI is a timeless machine that exudes vintage charm and deliver Read More
Features - Adjustable clutch and brake levers
- Slipper clutch with self-reinforcement
- Typical GS flyline
- Gold anodised upside-down fork
- Daytime riding lights
- Convenient luggage carrier
- Ride by wire technology
- Revolution counter
- Info Flat Screen
--
Additional Details Castor : 98 mm
Rim, front : 2.50 x 19"
Rim, rear : 4.00 x 17"
Inner Leg Curve : 1870 mm
Steering head angel : 63.3°
Permitted total weight : 345 kg
Alternator : Three-phase alternator with 308 W
Drive : Endless Z-ring chain with shock damping in rear wheel hub
--
Accessories Low seat
High seat
Luggage rack
Topcase Light
Heated grips
12 V power outlet and USB charging socket
--
Pros and Cons
Pros - Excellent build quality and reliability synonymous with BMW Motorrad.
- Versatile performance for both city riding and off-roading.
- Well-equipped with modern features and accessories.
- Comfortable riding position suitable for long journeys.
- Exceptional handling due to well-tuned suspension and chassis.
- Iconic and classic design
- Comfortable riding experience
- Reliable performance and excellent handling
- Variety of colour options
- Quality build and durability
Cons - One-piece seat may not be as comfortable as separate seats for some riders.
- The price point might be slightly high for its segment.
- Fuel tank capacity could have been larger for better long-distance usability.
- Absence of a quick-shifter could be felt by some experienced riders.
- Lacks some modern features
- Might be heavy for some riders
- Not the most powerful in its segment

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8054