Benelli Tornado 302 vs Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Benelli Tornado 302 vs Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Compare Specifications of Tornado 302 and Classic Signals Airborne Blue

Selected Bikes

Benelli Tornado 302 Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Royal Enfield Classic Signals Airborne Blue Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	300.00 cc	346.00 cc
Engine	In line 2 cylinders, 4-stroke, liquid cooled , 4 valves for cylinder double overhead camshaft	Single Cylinder 4 Stroke, Air cooled,
Engine Starting	Electric	Kick
Engine Lubrication	Wet sump	--
Clutch	Wet clutch	--
Fuel System	Electronic fuel injection with throttle body ø 34 mm	Constant Vacuum Carburettor
Ignition	ECU	--
Cooling System	--	Air Cooled
Maximum Power	26 kW @ 12000 rpm	19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Maximum Torque	27.0 Nm @ 9000 rpm	28Nm @ 4000 rpm
Transmission	--	5 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern	--	1-N-2-3-4-5
Frame	Steel trestle in steel tubes	Single down tube

Tyres

Front	110/70-ZR17	90 / 90 - 19
Rear	150/60 - ZR17	110 / 80 - 18
Wheel / RIM	--	Spoke

Brakes

Front	Double floating disks 260 mm with 4 pistons caliper	280 mm ventilated disc, double piston caliper
Rear	Single disc 240 mm with floating calliper single piston	240 mm ventilated disc, single piston caliper

Suspension

Front	41 mm upside-down forks	35 mm forks, 130 mm travel
Rear	Rear swing arm with central shock absorber	Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel

Colors Available

Colors

--

Airborne Blue

Physical Specs

Length	2175 mm	2160 mm
Width	746 mm	790 mm
Height	1146 mm	1090 mm
Weight	180 kg	192 kg
Wheelbase	1410 mm	1370 mm
Ground Clearance	180 mm	135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	14 litres	13.5 litres

Overview

About	Benelli Tornado 302R is an entry level fully-faired sportsbike. This particular model was showc Read More	Check the other variant Read More
Features	--	--

Pros and Cons

Pros	--	- Vibrant and unique aesthetic design - Robust engine with good performance - Comfortable ride quality with efficient suspension system - Efficient braking system for enhanced safety
Cons	--	- Some riders might find the bike a bit heavy at 192 kg - Fuel efficiency could be improved for city commute

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

5168